AAO agreed the Petitioner failed to identify a specific endeavor and failed to substantiate claims of national importance, finding her recommendation letters and industry articles of little probative value and her economic-impact and job-creation claims unsupported.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the Petitioner failed to identify a specific endeavor and failed to substantiate claims of national importance, finding her recommendation letters and industry articles of little probative value and her economic-impact and job-creation claims unsupported.
Because the Petitioner did not identify a consistent specific proposed endeavor, AAO concluded it could not assess whether she is well positioned to advance it.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Because the Petitioner did not identify a consistent specific proposed endeavor, AAO concluded it could not assess whether she is well positioned to advance it.
AAO found that because the Petitioner did not identify a consistent specific endeavor—having materially changed her description from marketing manager to entrepreneur focused on ASD services—it could not determine whether the endeavor has national importance.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that because the Petitioner did not identify a consistent specific endeavor—having materially changed her description from marketing manager to entrepreneur focused on ASD services—it could not determine whether the endeavor has national importance.
The AAO agreed the proposed endeavor was not clearly identified, that the Petitioner conflated field-level merit with endeavor-level merit, and that prospective impact did not reach beyond the employer and its clients.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO agreed the proposed endeavor was not clearly identified, that the Petitioner conflated field-level merit with endeavor-level merit, and that prospective impact did not reach beyond the employer and its clients.
advanced degree or foreign equivalent / bachelor's plus 5 years progressive experience
AAO 为什么未被说服
The AAO went further than the Director and found the credentials evaluation unreliable, so even foreign-degree equivalency was not established; it also affirmed that the supervisor/colleague letters failed to show progressive experience.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO went further than the Director and found the credentials evaluation unreliable, so even foreign-degree equivalency was not established; it also affirmed that the supervisor/colleague letters failed to show progressive experience.
AAO rejected the credentials evaluation as templated and lacking specific knowledge of the Brazilian system, but accepted equivalency based on the AACRAO EDGE database, reaching the same conclusion as the Director.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO rejected the credentials evaluation as templated and lacking specific knowledge of the Brazilian system, but accepted equivalency based on the AACRAO EDGE database, reaching the same conclusion as the Director.
On balance, beneficial to the United States to waive job offer requirement
裁决如何说明
AAO did not reach the third prong because the Petitioner failed to establish the first two prongs of the Dhanasar analysis due to the failure to identify a consistent specific proposed endeavor.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not reach the third prong because the Petitioner failed to establish the first two prongs of the Dhanasar analysis due to the failure to identify a consistent specific proposed endeavor.
AAO found the credential evaluation of little probative value due to templated language and lack of specific analysis, but independently used AACRAO EDGE to confirm the foreign degree is equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree, and accepted employer letters as evidence of five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the credential evaluation of little probative value due to templated language and lack of specific analysis, but independently used AACRAO EDGE to confirm the foreign degree is equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree, and accepted employer letters as evidence of five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience.