AAO found the diploma shows a four-year food technology credential that is not established to be equivalent to a U.S. advanced degree. No independent credentials evaluation or school official opinion was provided. The record does not support the Director's finding that a master's degree was received in 2018.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the diploma shows a four-year food technology credential that is not established to be equivalent to a U.S. advanced degree. No independent credentials evaluation or school official opinion was provided. The record does not support the Director's finding that a master's degree was received in 2018.
AAO held that authorship of co-authored papers, without evidence that the field has changed or that the work has been widely implemented, does not establish major significance; the Petitioner's role among multiple co-authors was also undifferentiated.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO held that authorship of co-authored papers, without evidence that the field has changed or that the work has been widely implemented, does not establish major significance; the Petitioner's role among multiple co-authors was also undifferentiated.
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found that completion of an accredited doctoral and post-doctoral training program, even if rare, does not constitute an outstanding achievement under the membership criterion, and the Petitioner's testimonial assertions about being one of two specialized fellows were unsupported by corroborating documentation.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that completion of an accredited doctoral and post-doctoral training program, even if rare, does not constitute an outstanding achievement under the membership criterion, and the Petitioner's testimonial assertions about being one of two specialized fellows were unsupported by corroborating documentation.
The application letter focuses on benefits to the employer and its clients and does not show the endeavor has broader implications, substantial positive economic effects, or national-level impact. Prior achievements bear on prong two, not prong one.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The application letter focuses on benefits to the employer and its clients and does not show the endeavor has broader implications, substantial positive economic effects, or national-level impact. Prior achievements bear on prong two, not prong one.