可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 10801–10810

NIWrecognition未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

recognition

recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field

AAO 为什么未被说服

Reference letters were conclusory and lacked specific examples of contributions to the field. Academic work was produced as a student and not shown to have had broader impact. Three citations did not persuasively establish recognition in the field. Participation in events was not substantiated by actual attendance evidence.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Reference letters were conclusory and lacked specific examples of contributions to the field. Academic work was produced as a student and not shown to have had broader impact. Three citations did not persuasively establish recognition in the field. Participation in events was not substantiated by actual attendance evidence.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-14_01_B5203; source_row=28591
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWacademic record未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

academic record

Official academic record showing degree or award relating to area of exceptional ability

AAO 为什么未被说服

The FAA-approved training documents post-dated the petition filing and thus could not establish eligibility at the time of filing. Foreign training documents lacked English translations and did not clearly show formal aviation education from an institution of higher learning. Secondary school records were not related to aviation. The engineering transcript lacked translation and showed only five courses.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The FAA-approved training documents post-dated the petition filing and thus could not establish eligibility at the time of filing. Foreign training documents lacked English translations and did not clearly show formal aviation education from an institution of higher learning. Secondary school records were not related to aviation. The engineering transcript lacked translation and showed only five courses.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-14_05_B5203; source_row=28605
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWrecognition未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

recognition

Recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field

AAO 为什么未被说服

The recommendation letters praised the Petitioner's personal accomplishments but did not explain how those accomplishments constituted recognition for achievements or significant contributions to the aviation field as a whole. A safety record alone does not set the Petitioner apart as having field-wide recognition.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The recommendation letters praised the Petitioner's personal accomplishments but did not explain how those accomplishments constituted recognition for achievements or significant contributions to the aviation field as a whole. A safety record alone does not set the Petitioner apart as having field-wide recognition.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-14_05_B5203; source_row=28610
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWten years experience已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

ten years experience

At least ten years of full-time experience in the occupation

证据为何得到认可

AAO found that the employer certification covering 1998–2015 combined with the service verification letter showing continued employment from June 2015 was sufficient by a preponderance of the evidence to establish more than ten years of full-time experience.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the employer certification covering 1998–2015 combined with the service verification letter showing continued employment from June 2015 was sufficient by a preponderance of the evidence to establish more than ten years of full-time experience.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-14_05_B5203; source_row=28606
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

On balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement

裁决如何说明

AAO did not separately address prong three, having concluded the petition failed on prongs one and two.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not separately address prong three, having concluded the petition failed on prongs one and two.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-14_05_B5203; source_row=28613
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWlicense or certification已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

license or certification

License to practice the profession or certification for a particular profession or occupation

证据为何得到认可

The Petitioner presented ATPs from two aviation authorities, which the AAO found sufficient.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner presented ATPs from two aviation authorities, which the AAO found sufficient.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-14_05_B5203; source_row=28607
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance

AAO 为什么未被说服

The recommendation letters lack specific examples showing how the petitioner's technique, course, or book impacted the field, and the petitioner did not submit corroborating evidence of widespread recognition or impact.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The recommendation letters lack specific examples showing how the petitioner's technique, course, or book impacted the field, and the petitioner did not submit corroborating evidence of widespread recognition or impact.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-14_01_B2203; source_row=28583
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging the work of others

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO withdrew the Director's finding, concluding that while certificates and letters confirmed officiating participation, the Petitioner did not provide descriptions of his duties showing he evaluated or judged competitors' work rather than merely enforcing rules.…

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding, concluding that while certificates and letters confirmed officiating participation, the Petitioner did not provide descriptions of his duties showing he evaluated or judged competitors' work rather than merely enforcing rules. The evidence of serving as an 'official' or 'referee' was insufficient without further documentation showing he awarded points or exercised judgment in choosing winners.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-13_02_B2203; source_row=28560
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO withdrew the Director's finding, holding that while the evidence confirmed the Petitioner received awards, it did not demonstrate the national or international significance of those awards. The limited media coverage and other materials were insufficient to establish that the awards are nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding, holding that while the evidence confirmed the Petitioner received awards, it did not demonstrate the national or international significance of those awards. The limited media coverage and other materials were insufficient to establish that the awards are nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-13_02_B2203; source_row=28557
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO agreed the criterion was not met, but criticized the Director's reasoning that the letters did not describe the selection process at all. AAO found the letters in fact described a selection process but were inconsistent with one another and lacked independent corroboration, and further failed to identify the Petitioner's specific competitive results that led to team membership.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the criterion was not met, but criticized the Director's reasoning that the letters did not describe the selection process at all. AAO found the letters in fact described a selection process but were inconsistent with one another and lacked independent corroboration, and further failed to identify the Petitioner's specific competitive results that led to team membership.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-09-13_02_B2203; source_row=28558
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评