Comparing the Petitioner's 2005 Filipino income to the salary of one colleague does not reliably demonstrate a high salary relative to others in her field; appropriate evidence would be wage statistics or compensation surveys for administrative service managers in her geographic area in the Philippines.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Comparing the Petitioner's 2005 Filipino income to the salary of one colleague does not reliably demonstrate a high salary relative to others in her field; appropriate evidence would be wage statistics or compensation surveys for administrative service managers in her geographic area in the Philippines.
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards (h)(3)(i)
AAO 为什么未被说服
The new award certificate from a branch manager was not accompanied by information about the award's national or international recognition, and the Petitioner did not show that mentoring others in building a successful business is in the same or allied field as administrative services management.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The new award certificate from a branch manager was not accompanied by information about the award's national or international recognition, and the Petitioner did not show that mentoring others in building a successful business is in the same or allied field as administrative services management.
The letter confirmed membership and described the association's mission but did not include bylaws or membership requirements showing that the organization requires outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The letter confirmed membership and described the association's mission but did not include bylaws or membership requirements showing that the organization requires outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts.
AAO found that the Petitioner's statements reflect intention to provide valuable services but did not demonstrate that the prospective impact of her proposed endeavor rises to the level of national importance. Her work would not sufficiently extend beyond her employer and clientele to broadly impact the accounting and financial services industries or the U.S. economy, and she did not show significant potential to employ U.S.…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Petitioner's statements reflect intention to provide valuable services but did not demonstrate that the prospective impact of her proposed endeavor rises to the level of national importance. Her work would not sufficiently extend beyond her employer and clientele to broadly impact the accounting and financial services industries or the U.S. economy, and she did not show significant potential to employ U.S. workers or offer substantial positive economic effects.
The AAO agreed that while the endeavor has substantial merit, it lacks national importance. The Petitioner's proposed IT consulting work does not show broader implications beyond individual clients or companies, and her assertion about job creation was unsupported by evidence of substantial positive economic effects.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO agreed that while the endeavor has substantial merit, it lacks national importance. The Petitioner's proposed IT consulting work does not show broader implications beyond individual clients or companies, and her assertion about job creation was unsupported by evidence of substantial positive economic effects.
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
证据为何得到认可
AAO agreed with the Director that the submitted evidence establishes the Petitioner meets the awards criterion based on multiple national and international film awards received.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the submitted evidence establishes the Petitioner meets the awards criterion based on multiple national and international film awards received.