final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim at the very top of the field
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found the Petitioner's career — spanning 14 years with one award-winning feature film, a few award-winning short films, and documentary work — did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim.…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner's career — spanning 14 years with one award-winning feature film, a few award-winning short films, and documentary work — did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim. Awards were not followed by continued activity or recognition, festival appearances were of limited demonstrable significance, the television documentary project was unverified as completed, judging was limited to a single event, and testimonial letters were too general to establish impact of major significance.
AAO determined the Petitioner's exhibitions drew only local media attention, her commercial success in photography and clothing was modest, and the supporting evidence did not establish the sustained national or international acclaim required for the EB-1A classification.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO determined the Petitioner's exhibitions drew only local media attention, her commercial success in photography and clothing was modest, and the supporting evidence did not establish the sustained national or international acclaim required for the EB-1A classification.
AAO found the new Vogue Ukraine 2014 article, which focused on the Petitioner and her photography in connection with a perfume store opening, combined with readership figures showing Vogue Ukraine's leading position among Ukrainian fashion titles, established that this article appeared in major media.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the new Vogue Ukraine 2014 article, which focused on the Petitioner and her photography in connection with a perfume store opening, combined with readership figures showing Vogue Ukraine's leading position among Ukrainian fashion titles, established that this article appeared in major media.
AAO declined to consider new evidence and arguments under this criterion because the Petitioner had not raised it or submitted new evidence on this criterion in her third (most recent prior) motion. The scope of the present motion is limited to AAO's prior decision.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to consider new evidence and arguments under this criterion because the Petitioner had not raised it or submitted new evidence on this criterion in her third (most recent prior) motion. The scope of the present motion is limited to AAO's prior decision.
AAO did not need to reach this criterion because the Petitioner had already met three criteria; AAO instead considered the salary evidence in the final merits determination.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not need to reach this criterion because the Petitioner had already met three criteria; AAO instead considered the salary evidence in the final merits determination.