five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience equivalent to advanced degree
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found the concurrent employment claim unsupported by the letter dates, the patient letters insufficient to quantify session hours, and the Petitioner's arithmetic internally inconsistent. AAO also noted the Petitioner failed to show how working full-time then part-time demonstrates progression in the specialty.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the concurrent employment claim unsupported by the letter dates, the patient letters insufficient to quantify session hours, and the Petitioner's arithmetic internally inconsistent. AAO also noted the Petitioner failed to show how working full-time then part-time demonstrates progression in the specialty.
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive job offer and labor certification
裁决如何说明
AAO did not reach the third prong as the Petitioner failed to establish the first prong and the motion review is narrowly limited to the basis for the prior dismissal.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not reach the third prong as the Petitioner failed to establish the first prong and the motion review is narrowly limited to the basis for the prior dismissal.
AAO did not reach the second prong as the Petitioner failed to establish the first prong and the motion review is narrowly limited to the basis for the prior dismissal.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not reach the second prong as the Petitioner failed to establish the first prong and the motion review is narrowly limited to the basis for the prior dismissal.
recognition for achievements and significant contributions
AAO 为什么未被说服
Recommendation letters from the Petitioner's instructors did not show that her work as a teacher had impact beyond her students at a level indicative of significant contributions to the field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Recommendation letters from the Petitioner's instructors did not show that her work as a teacher had impact beyond her students at a level indicative of significant contributions to the field.
AAO found all three elements satisfied: (1) submission of plagiarized publications constituted a false representation to a government official; (2) the misrepresentations were willful, given the Form I-140 perjury certification and the lack of credible explanation; and (3) the misrepresentations were material because the publications purported to satisfy the exceptional-ability eligibility criteria.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found all three elements satisfied: (1) submission of plagiarized publications constituted a false representation to a government official; (2) the misrepresentations were willful, given the Form I-140 perjury certification and the lack of credible explanation; and (3) the misrepresentations were material because the publications purported to satisfy the exceptional-ability eligibility criteria.
The submitted employment letters covered only short periods (Nov 2015–Mar 2016 and Nov 2016–Jun 2018) and did not establish ten years of full-time experience as required.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The submitted employment letters covered only short periods (Nov 2015–Mar 2016 and Nov 2016–Jun 2018) and did not establish ten years of full-time experience as required.