可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 11001–11010

NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found that the reference letters discussed only potential of the Petitioner's work without demonstrating a record of success or implementation in the field. Post-filing evidence (2019 job letter and articles) could not be considered. Citations (27 per Google Scholar) were insufficient to show he was well positioned. Education alone did not suffice, and peer review activity and memberships were not shown to be significant.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the reference letters discussed only potential of the Petitioner's work without demonstrating a record of success or implementation in the field. Post-filing evidence (2019 job letter and articles) could not be considered. Citations (27 per Google Scholar) were insufficient to show he was well positioned. Education alone did not suffice, and peer review activity and memberships were not shown to be significant.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-12_04_B5203; source_row=28337
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWexceptional ability other已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

exceptional ability other

Ten years of full-time experience (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(B))

证据为何得到认可

AAO did not disturb the Director's finding that the ten-year employment criterion was met.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not disturb the Director's finding that the ten-year employment criterion was met.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-12_01_B5203; source_row=28325
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

Lato sensu MBA qualifies as foreign equivalent advanced degree

裁决如何说明

AAO identified a material inconsistency between the credential evaluator's opinion and AACRAO EDGE, which states that lato sensu programs lead to professional certificates, not graduate degrees. AAO remanded for resolution of this inconsistency.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO identified a material inconsistency between the credential evaluator's opinion and AACRAO EDGE, which states that lato sensu programs lead to professional certificates, not graduate degrees. AAO remanded for resolution of this inconsistency.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-12_01_B5203; source_row=28322
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

On balance, beneficial to the United States to waive job offer requirement

裁决如何说明

AAO found the Director's refusal to analyze the third prong to be insufficient and remanded for a proper analysis of all three prongs.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director's refusal to analyze the third prong to be insufficient and remanded for a proper analysis of all three prongs.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-12_01_B5203; source_row=28329
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

Occupation qualifies as a member of the professions

裁决如何说明

AAO noted the Director failed to address this threshold question and remanded for the Director to determine whether 'Sales Manager / Customer Experience Representative' qualifies as a member of the professions.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO noted the Director failed to address this threshold question and remanded for the Director to determine whether 'Sales Manager / Customer Experience Representative' qualifies as a member of the professions.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-12_01_B5203; source_row=28321
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWexceptional ability other未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

exceptional ability other

Three additional claimed exceptional ability criteria

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to adjudicate the three additional criteria on appeal and instead remanded for the Director to evaluate the Petitioner's appellate arguments regarding those criteria.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to adjudicate the three additional criteria on appeal and instead remanded for the Director to evaluate the Petitioner's appellate arguments regarding those criteria.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-12_01_B5203; source_row=28326
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

Technologist in Data Processing plus five years experience qualifies as baccalaureate equivalent

裁决如何说明

AAO noted the record contains no credential evaluation for this degree, and that AACRAO indicates the Technologist title represents only 2-3 years of university study, appearing to indicate it is not a foreign equivalent of a baccalaureate degree. The matter is remanded for the Director to address this issue.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO noted the record contains no credential evaluation for this degree, and that AACRAO indicates the Technologist title represents only 2-3 years of university study, appearing to indicate it is not a foreign equivalent of a baccalaureate degree. The matter is remanded for the Director to address this issue.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-12_01_B5203; source_row=28323
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWexceptional ability other已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

exceptional ability other

Official academic record (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(A))

证据为何得到认可

AAO did not disturb the Director's finding that the official academic record criterion was met.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not disturb the Director's finding that the official academic record criterion was met.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-12_01_B5203; source_row=28324
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

Substantial merit and national importance

裁决如何说明

AAO did not resolve the first prong on appeal but remanded for the Director to conduct a proper Dhanasar analysis including all three prongs and the arguments made on appeal.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not resolve the first prong on appeal but remanded for the Director to conduct a proper Dhanasar analysis including all three prongs and the arguments made on appeal.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-12_01_B5203; source_row=28327
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

Well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO withdrew the Director's second-prong finding because it appeared to be based at least in part on the Petitioner's education, which was itself unresolved, and remanded for proper analysis.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the Director's second-prong finding because it appeared to be based at least in part on the Petitioner's education, which was itself unresolved, and remanded for proper analysis.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-08-12_01_B5203; source_row=28328
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评