high salary or remuneration (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(D))
AAO 为什么未被说服
Brazilian income figures do not align with the cited consultant-salary benchmark, and consultant remuneration is of questionable relevance to operating his own retail shops.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Brazilian income figures do not align with the cited consultant-salary benchmark, and consultant remuneration is of questionable relevance to operating his own retail shops.
AAO found the Petitioner was not qualified to practice dentistry in the United States at the time of filing, had no employer interest at filing, and improperly expanded his proposed endeavor post-filing to include lower-level positions such as dental assistant. Post-filing evidence and material amendments to the petition cannot cure the deficiencies at the time of filing.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner was not qualified to practice dentistry in the United States at the time of filing, had no employer interest at filing, and improperly expanded his proposed endeavor post-filing to include lower-level positions such as dental assistant. Post-filing evidence and material amendments to the petition cannot cure the deficiencies at the time of filing.
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
证据为何得到认可
AAO agreed the criterion was met, finding the 2009 ABS-CBN article was about the Petitioner, going into detail about his career and work as a writer, and that ABS-CBN is a leading media organization in the Philippines.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the criterion was met, finding the 2009 ABS-CBN article was about the Petitioner, going into detail about his career and work as a writer, and that ABS-CBN is a leading media organization in the Philippines.
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
证据为何得到认可
AAO agreed the Petitioner met this criterion based on receipt of writing competition awards, including evidence that his awards were noted as among 'the most prestigious' in broader media including ABS-CBN.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the Petitioner met this criterion based on receipt of writing competition awards, including evidence that his awards were noted as among 'the most prestigious' in broader media including ABS-CBN.
AAO withdrew the Director's determination, holding that the plain language of the criterion only requires evidence of judging, and that final-merits-type standards (sustained acclaim, top of field) belong to step two, not the initial evidentiary criteria step.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the Director's determination, holding that the plain language of the criterion only requires evidence of judging, and that final-merits-type standards (sustained acclaim, top of field) belong to step two, not the initial evidentiary criteria step.
Official academic record showing advanced degree or foreign equivalent
AAO 为什么未被说服
The credential evaluator's conclusion was rejected because the specialization certificate reflected a lato-sensu program (leading to a professional certificate, not a graduate degree), the evaluator provided no comparative analysis of the coursework to a U.S. master's program, and the evaluation's credibility was undermined by lack of supporting analysis.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The credential evaluator's conclusion was rejected because the specialization certificate reflected a lato-sensu program (leading to a professional certificate, not a graduate degree), the evaluator provided no comparative analysis of the coursework to a U.S. master's program, and the evaluation's credibility was undermined by lack of supporting analysis.
Five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience in the specialty
AAO 为什么未被说服
The partner letter lacked specificity regarding job titles, duties, and dates of employment for positions held beyond 'partner,' making it insufficient to establish five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience. The professional certificates were also insufficient, as one predated the bachelor's degree and the other documented only a 35-hour course.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The partner letter lacked specificity regarding job titles, duties, and dates of employment for positions held beyond 'partner,' making it insufficient to establish five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience. The professional certificates were also insufficient, as one predated the bachelor's degree and the other documented only a 35-hour course.