可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 11161–11170

NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

advanced degree qualification

AAO 为什么未被说服

The record shows only an associate's degree, and the Director's decision did not include the Matter of Sea analysis needed to treat education-plus-experience as equivalent to a bachelor's degree.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The record shows only an associate's degree, and the Director's decision did not include the Matter of Sea analysis needed to treat education-plus-experience as equivalent to a bachelor's degree.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-15_01_B5203; source_row=28110
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学博士

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim

裁决如何说明

AAO reserved the formal final merits determination because the initial evidence threshold was not met, but noted in advisory terms that the record does not support the required level of acclaim.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved the formal final merits determination because the initial evidence threshold was not met, but noted in advisory terms that the record does not support the required level of acclaim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-15_03_B2203; source_row=28125
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学博士

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed that the record includes copies of articles authored by the Petitioner published in peer-reviewed journals or presented at professional conferences, satisfying this criterion.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the record includes copies of articles authored by the Petitioner published in peer-reviewed journals or presented at professional conferences, satisfying this criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-15_03_B2203; source_row=28124
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance

裁决如何说明

The Petitioner mentioned criterion v only in passing in her appellate brief's conclusion without raising specific challenges to the Director's denial. AAO deemed the issue waived on appeal.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner mentioned criterion v only in passing in her appellate brief's conclusion without raising specific challenges to the Director's denial. AAO deemed the issue waived on appeal.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-15_02_B2203; source_row=28115
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role for distinguished organization

证据为何得到认可

AAO did not disturb the Director's conclusion that the Petitioner met criterion viii.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not disturb the Director's conclusion that the Petitioner met criterion viii.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-15_02_B2203; source_row=28116
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to formally conduct a final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria. In dicta, AAO noted the record did not support the required acclaim and recognition.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to formally conduct a final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria. In dicta, AAO noted the record did not support the required acclaim and recognition.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-15_02_B2203; source_row=28118
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

证据为何得到认可

AAO did not disturb the Director's conclusion that the Petitioner met criterion iv.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not disturb the Director's conclusion that the Petitioner met criterion iv.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-15_02_B2203; source_row=28114
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to reach prong 2, stating that further analysis would serve no meaningful purpose given the failure to establish prong 1.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to reach prong 2, stating that further analysis would serve no meaningful purpose given the failure to establish prong 1.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-15_03_B5203; source_row=28127
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

beneficial to the United States to waive job offer requirement

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to reach prong 3, stating that further analysis would serve no meaningful purpose given the failure to establish prong 1.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to reach prong 3, stating that further analysis would serve no meaningful purpose given the failure to establish prong 1.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-15_03_B5203; source_row=28128
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to evaluate the prong on the merits and remanded for the Director to apply the Dhanasar framework to the proposed endeavor.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to evaluate the prong on the merits and remanded for the Director to apply the Dhanasar framework to the proposed endeavor.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-15_01_B5203; source_row=28111
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评