可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 11171–11180

NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO concluded the record did not establish that the endeavor has broader implications within the field or significant potential to employ U.S. workers, and that the Petitioner's focus on the general field of software development did not address the specific endeavor's national importance.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concluded the record did not establish that the endeavor has broader implications within the field or significant potential to employ U.S. workers, and that the Petitioner's focus on the general field of software development did not address the specific endeavor's national importance.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-14_07_B5203; source_row=28094
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足

案件事实

经济学

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

While the Petitioner showed her proposed employment as an economist has substantial merit, she failed to establish national importance because she did not specifically describe her proposed endeavor's prospective impact. She referenced past work and claimed models could be applied to U.S. welfare programs, but did not describe the specific model or how it would have broader implications.…

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
While the Petitioner showed her proposed employment as an economist has substantial merit, she failed to establish national importance because she did not specifically describe her proposed endeavor's prospective impact. She referenced past work and claimed models could be applied to U.S. welfare programs, but did not describe the specific model or how it would have broader implications. Similarly, her proposal to expand understanding of a foreign economy lacked evidence of national importance or a detailed description of future intentions.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-14_03_B5203; source_row=28079
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估未满足

案件事实

金融

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO agreed the final merits standard was not met. The Petitioner's leading roles lacked descriptions of specific achievements; his published articles did not set him apart from co-authors or establish prestige of publications; his media appearances were largely geographically limited; his remuneration showed high pay only for 2018–2019 without sustained evidence; and his organizational service did not demonstrate acclaim in…

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the final merits standard was not met. The Petitioner's leading roles lacked descriptions of specific achievements; his published articles did not set him apart from co-authors or establish prestige of publications; his media appearances were largely geographically limited; his remuneration showed high pay only for 2018–2019 without sustained evidence; and his organizational service did not demonstrate acclaim in the international tax community.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-14_03_B2203; source_row=28078
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination — sustained acclaim and very top of field

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO's aggregate review found minimal documentary support for sustained acclaim: notable absence of commercial-success evidence (criterion x) for a performing artist, sparse documentation of recordings/albums, low YouTube view counts without comparators, and uncorroborated assertions in support letters.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO's aggregate review found minimal documentary support for sustained acclaim: notable absence of commercial-success evidence (criterion x) for a performing artist, sparse documentation of recordings/albums, low YouTube view counts without comparators, and uncorroborated assertions in support letters.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-14_02_B2203; source_row=28071
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

The AAO agreed substantial merit was shown but found the recommendation letters focused retrospectively on past achievements, contained unsupported claims and misattributions, and did not show how the specific prospective endeavor would have national or global implications or substantial positive economic effects.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO agreed substantial merit was shown but found the recommendation letters focused retrospectively on past achievements, contained unsupported claims and misattributions, and did not show how the specific prospective endeavor would have national or global implications or substantial positive economic effects.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-14_08_B5203; source_row=28097
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWEB-1A · 高薪酬未满足

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 高薪酬

salary or remuneration demonstrating exceptional ability

AAO 为什么未被说服

The tax return itemized the cited amounts as assets held (shares of stock and corporate interest), not income earned, with stock value held constant year-over-year and the corporate interest reflecting a net-zero return on a capital contribution.…

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The tax return itemized the cited amounts as assets held (shares of stock and corporate interest), not income earned, with stock value held constant year-over-year and the corporate interest reflecting a net-zero return on a capital contribution. Petitioner's actual declared income of R$49,828.06 was below the junior-level salary for a small organization in his own salary survey, not nearly ten times the highest master's-level salary.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-14_05_B5203; source_row=28088
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

advanced degree qualification

AAO 为什么未被说服

The 2006 diploma does not indicate the corresponding academic level and neither the 2000 nor 2006 diploma is supported by a qualifying independent credentials evaluation. The opinion letter author had a prior working relationship with the Petitioner and thus lacks independence. The record fails to establish equivalency to a U.S. advanced degree.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The 2006 diploma does not indicate the corresponding academic level and neither the 2000 nor 2006 diploma is supported by a qualifying independent credentials evaluation. The opinion letter author had a prior working relationship with the Petitioner and thus lacks independence. The record fails to establish equivalency to a U.S. advanced degree.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-14_02_B5203; source_row=28073
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO concludes the Petitioner did not show how working as a marketing manager would have broader implications beyond her immediate employer(s), and that focus on the importance of marketing in general does not address the specific endeavor.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concludes the Petitioner did not show how working as a marketing manager would have broader implications beyond her immediate employer(s), and that focus on the importance of marketing in general does not address the specific endeavor.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-14_06_B5203; source_row=28091
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO reserved its opinion on the second prong because the petition failed on the first prong.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved its opinion on the second prong because the petition failed on the first prong.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-14_07_B5203; source_row=28095
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement

裁决如何说明

AAO reserved its opinion on the third prong because the petition failed on the first prong.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved its opinion on the third prong because the petition failed on the first prong.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-14_07_B5203; source_row=28096
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评