Final merits determination for exceptional ability
裁决如何说明
Because the petitioner met only two of the six criteria (not the required three), AAO determined a final merits determination was not required. AAO nonetheless noted agreement with the director's conclusion that the record does not establish experience beyond that ordinarily encountered.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Because the petitioner met only two of the six criteria (not the required three), AAO determined a final merits determination was not required. AAO nonetheless noted agreement with the director's conclusion that the record does not establish experience beyond that ordinarily encountered.
Salary or remuneration demonstrating exceptional ability (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(D))
AAO 为什么未被说服
The petitioner did not contest this finding on appeal, so AAO affirmed the Director's conclusion that Polish salary statistics were irrelevant and U.S. salary comparisons and corroborating tax documents were absent.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner did not contest this finding on appeal, so AAO affirmed the Director's conclusion that Polish salary statistics were irrelevant and U.S. salary comparisons and corroborating tax documents were absent.
Membership in professional associations (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(E))
证据为何得到认可
AAO agreed that the petitioner's membership in the National Association of Realtors and a local Realtors association is relevant and satisfies this criterion.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the petitioner's membership in the National Association of Realtors and a local Realtors association is relevant and satisfies this criterion.
Official academic record showing degree relating to area of exceptional ability (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(A))
AAO 为什么未被说服
For the same reasons as under the advanced degree analysis, AAO found the academic record evidence insufficiently credible and detailed to meet this criterion.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
For the same reasons as under the advanced degree analysis, AAO found the academic record evidence insufficiently credible and detailed to meet this criterion.
Five years of progressively responsible post-baccalaureate experience
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO agreed with and expanded on the Director's concerns, noting additional contradictions between the initial employment letters, the new employment letters, and the petitioner's résumé (e.g., conflicting titles and dates). The letters lacked independent corroboration and were insufficiently detailed to establish the progressive nature of the work.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with and expanded on the Director's concerns, noting additional contradictions between the initial employment letters, the new employment letters, and the petitioner's résumé (e.g., conflicting titles and dates). The letters lacked independent corroboration and were insufficiently detailed to establish the progressive nature of the work.
Advanced degree or foreign equivalent academic record
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found the Polish academic documents lacked official character, contained spelling errors, were in English without original Polish copies, were unsigned and undated in part, and did not link the petitioner to the courses. The Swedish evidence was only a certificate of participation without confirmation of graduation. The credential evaluations offered no independent analysis and were given little weight.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Polish academic documents lacked official character, contained spelling errors, were in English without original Polish copies, were unsigned and undated in part, and did not link the petitioner to the courses. The Swedish evidence was only a certificate of participation without confirmation of graduation. The credential evaluations offered no independent analysis and were given little weight.
Recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(F))
AAO 为什么未被说服
Petitioner did not contest this criterion on appeal. On de novo review, AAO found the letters described good character, skill, and internal accomplishments but did not demonstrate impact on the field or industry as a whole. The claim of international renown appeared to reflect only work in multiple countries rather than a world-renowned reputation.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Petitioner did not contest this criterion on appeal. On de novo review, AAO found the letters described good character, skill, and internal accomplishments but did not demonstrate impact on the field or industry as a whole. The claim of international renown appeared to reflect only work in multiple countries rather than a world-renowned reputation.
AAO concludes the proposed endeavor has substantial merit (advancing scientific knowledge on food-waste treatment and water pollution) and national importance based on potential prospective impact, including collaboration with USDA's Agricultural Research Service and application to Clean Water Act goals.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concludes the proposed endeavor has substantial merit (advancing scientific knowledge on food-waste treatment and water pollution) and national importance based on potential prospective impact, including collaboration with USDA's Agricultural Research Service and application to Clean Water Act goals.