可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 11231–11240

NIWNIW · 综合权衡已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

土木 / 结构工程博士20 篇论文

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement

证据为何得到认可

AAO finds the Petitioner's contributions are sufficiently valuable that on balance the U.S. benefits from waiving the job offer/labor certification requirement, even assuming availability of other qualified U.S. workers.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO finds the Petitioner's contributions are sufficiently valuable that on balance the U.S. benefits from waiving the job offer/labor certification requirement, even assuming availability of other qualified U.S. workers.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-08_02_B5203; source_row=28040
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

土木 / 结构工程博士20 篇论文

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

证据为何得到认可

AAO disagrees with the Director and finds the Petitioner well positioned based on her Ph.D., 20+ publications, citation record, peer-review service, and reference letters from independent researchers describing how they have built upon her work.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO disagrees with the Director and finds the Petitioner well positioned based on her Ph.D., 20+ publications, citation record, peer-review service, and reference letters from independent researchers describing how they have built upon her work.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-08_02_B5203; source_row=28039
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to reach the second prong because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the first prong of Dhanasar, making further analysis unnecessary.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to reach the second prong because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the first prong of Dhanasar, making further analysis unnecessary.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-08_01_B5203; source_row=28028
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive job offer requirement

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to reach the third prong because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the first prong of Dhanasar, making further analysis unnecessary.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to reach the third prong because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the first prong of Dhanasar, making further analysis unnecessary.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-08_01_B5203; source_row=28029
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

The AAO found that the Petitioner failed to provide sufficient information about the specific endeavor he proposes to undertake, that the general field of counterterrorism and security does not itself establish national importance, and that he neither showed broader national implications nor substantial positive economic effects attributable to his future work.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found that the Petitioner failed to provide sufficient information about the specific endeavor he proposes to undertake, that the general field of counterterrorism and security does not itself establish national importance, and that he neither showed broader national implications nor substantial positive economic effects attributable to his future work.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-07_01_B5203; source_row=28021
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员未满足

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership

AAO 为什么未被说服

The IEEE senior membership requirements do not require outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts; instead they require ten years of professional practice and significant performance, which can include ordinary job responsibilities such as team leadership. The AARP schedule document also did not state criteria for selection.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The IEEE senior membership requirements do not require outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts; instead they require ten years of professional practice and significant performance, which can include ordinary job responsibilities such as team leadership. The AARP schedule document also did not state criteria for selection.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-07_01_B2203; source_row=28015
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献未满足

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions

AAO 为什么未被说服

While letters and documentation showed the Petitioner's contributions were significant to his employer and its customers, they did not specifically articulate how those contributions were of major significance to the field of cloud computing as a whole.…

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
While letters and documentation showed the Petitioner's contributions were significant to his employer and its customers, they did not specifically articulate how those contributions were of major significance to the field of cloud computing as a whole. Press releases did not attribute the software to the Petitioner, and news articles showed only that a law firm and university used the tool, which does not demonstrate widespread impact on the field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-07_01_B2203; source_row=28016
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

The AAO declined to analyze prong two because the Petitioner failed to establish the first prong, making further analysis unnecessary.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO declined to analyze prong two because the Petitioner failed to establish the first prong, making further analysis unnecessary.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-07_01_B5203; source_row=28022
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to waive job offer requirement

裁决如何说明

The AAO declined to analyze prong three because the Petitioner failed to establish the first prong, making further analysis unnecessary.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO declined to analyze prong three because the Petitioner failed to establish the first prong, making further analysis unnecessary.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-07_01_B5203; source_row=28023
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

裁决如何说明

The Petitioner did not contest the Director's conclusion on the judging criterion on appeal, so AAO deemed the issue waived and did not address it.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not contest the Director's conclusion on the judging criterion on appeal, so AAO deemed the issue waived and did not address it.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-07-07_01_B2203; source_row=28017
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评