可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 11261–11270

NIWEB-1A · 高薪酬未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

EB-1A · 高薪酬

Salary or remuneration demonstrating exceptional ability

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found the salary figures inconsistent and improperly combined salary income with business profits and dividends, making a valid comparison to others similarly situated impossible.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the salary figures inconsistent and improperly combined salary income with business profits and dividends, making a valid comparison to others similarly situated impossible.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-30_02_B5203; source_row=27976
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

Advanced degree or equivalent qualification

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found that an associate degree plus a postgraduate specialization certificate does not equal a baccalaureate or advanced degree. The credential evaluations were unreliable, and the regulations provide no mechanism for combining lesser credentials into an advanced degree equivalent.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that an associate degree plus a postgraduate specialization certificate does not equal a baccalaureate or advanced degree. The credential evaluations were unreliable, and the regulations provide no mechanism for combining lesser credentials into an advanced degree equivalent.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-30_02_B5203; source_row=27979
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡未满足

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能工程师学士

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to waive job offer and labor certification

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found the Petitioner's arguments relied on generalities about his field rather than specific national benefits. The job offer letter showed one employer's urgency, not national urgency. Two employers declining to pursue labor certification does not make labor certification inherently impractical, and granting the waiver on that basis would effectively make labor certification optional.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner's arguments relied on generalities about his field rather than specific national benefits. The job offer letter showed one employer's urgency, not national urgency. Two employers declining to pursue labor certification does not make labor certification inherently impractical, and granting the waiver on that basis would effectively make labor certification optional.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-30_04_B5203; source_row=27988
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能工程师学士

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found the Petitioner failed to articulate a specific proposed endeavor beyond describing past employment and intending to continue similar work. The evidence only showed benefit to the Petitioner's employers and their clients, not national importance. There is no blanket waiver for information systems managers, and the Dhanasar framework requires a specific proposed endeavor with broader national impact.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner failed to articulate a specific proposed endeavor beyond describing past employment and intending to continue similar work. The evidence only showed benefit to the Petitioner's employers and their clients, not national importance. There is no blanket waiver for information systems managers, and the Dhanasar framework requires a specific proposed endeavor with broader national impact.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-30_04_B5203; source_row=27986
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWexceptional ability other未满足

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能工程师学士

审查的问题

exceptional ability other

official academic record relating to area of exceptional ability

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found the accounting degree did not relate to the claimed area of exceptional ability (information systems management), with only two of 40 courses having any demonstrable relation. The certificates were not from colleges, universities, schools, or other institutions of learning as the regulation requires, and appeared to reflect short-term product-specific training.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the accounting degree did not relate to the claimed area of exceptional ability (information systems management), with only two of 40 courses having any demonstrable relation. The certificates were not from colleges, universities, schools, or other institutions of learning as the regulation requires, and appeared to reflect short-term product-specific training.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-30_04_B5203; source_row=27989
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO concluded the Petitioner had no experience or specialized training in medical research, and that his attempt to switch his proposed endeavor to clinical medicine practice was an impermissible material change after filing.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concluded the Petitioner had no experience or specialized training in medical research, and that his attempt to switch his proposed endeavor to clinical medicine practice was an impermissible material change after filing.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-30_03_B5203; source_row=27984
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

证据为何得到认可

AAO declined to revisit the Director's favorable conclusion on prong one.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to revisit the Director's favorable conclusion on prong one.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-30_03_B5203; source_row=27983
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to waive job offer/labor certification

裁决如何说明

AAO reserved the third prong because the second-prong failure was dispositive, but noted in a footnote that the Petitioner's reliance on physician shortage arguments was inappropriate under Dhanasar.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved the third prong because the second-prong failure was dispositive, but noted in a footnote that the Petitioner's reliance on physician shortage arguments was inappropriate under Dhanasar.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-30_03_B5203; source_row=27985
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

authorship of scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed with the Director that the criterion for authorship of scholarly articles was satisfied by the three published papers.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the criterion for authorship of scholarly articles was satisfied by the three published papers.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-30_01_B2203; source_row=27968
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 高薪酬已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

EB-1A · 高薪酬

high salary or remuneration in relation to others

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed with the Director that the Beneficiary's salary evidence met this criterion, noting total 2019 remuneration of $818,267.92 and 2020 salary at approximately $185,000 annual rate.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Beneficiary's salary evidence met this criterion, noting total 2019 remuneration of $818,267.92 and 2020 salary at approximately $185,000 annual rate.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-30_01_B2203; source_row=27970
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评