Published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media
AAO 为什么未被说服
The record includes no evidence about the state of media in the Petitioner's home country or that sports reporting was directly affected by political conditions. The unsupported claim that Mundo Oriental has regional and national circulation is insufficient without circulation figures.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The record includes no evidence about the state of media in the Petitioner's home country or that sports reporting was directly affected by political conditions. The unsupported claim that Mundo Oriental has regional and national circulation is insufficient without circulation figures.
AAO found the credential evaluation unreliable because AACRAO EDGE characterizes Brazilian lato sensu programs as leading to professional certificates, not graduate degrees, and the evaluator failed to reconcile this discrepancy. The evaluator also did not establish the length of the Petitioner's bachelor's degree or review employment letters required by regulation to establish progressive work experience.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the credential evaluation unreliable because AACRAO EDGE characterizes Brazilian lato sensu programs as leading to professional certificates, not graduate degrees, and the evaluator failed to reconcile this discrepancy. The evaluator also did not establish the length of the Petitioner's bachelor's degree or review employment letters required by regulation to establish progressive work experience.
AAO withdrew the Director's prong two finding because it was based at least in part on the flawed credential evaluation that has not been upheld, and remanded for reconsideration.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the Director's prong two finding because it was based at least in part on the flawed credential evaluation that has not been upheld, and remanded for reconsideration.
Lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
证据为何得到认可
AAO found that the federation letter combined with a corroborating photograph of a plaque sufficiently establishes the Petitioner's 2006 national championship title in the 25-29 age group, satisfying criterion (i) on that basis alone.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the federation letter combined with a corroborating photograph of a plaque sufficiently establishes the Petitioner's 2006 national championship title in the 25-29 age group, satisfying criterion (i) on that basis alone.
AAO explicitly reserved the final merits determination because fewer than three criteria were met, though it noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not establish the required acclaim.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly reserved the final merits determination because fewer than three criteria were met, though it noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not establish the required acclaim.
The Petitioner's membership in one association had already expired at the time of filing, and she did not show the organization qualifies as a professional association. The second association's membership evidence was not submitted before the Director and was therefore not considered on appeal; and in any event, the Petitioner did not show that organization qualifies as a professional association.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner's membership in one association had already expired at the time of filing, and she did not show the organization qualifies as a professional association. The second association's membership evidence was not submitted before the Director and was therefore not considered on appeal; and in any event, the Petitioner did not show that organization qualifies as a professional association.
The Petitioner did not establish that the presented certificates represent 'official academic records' as required, did not corroborate that training certificates do not come with transcripts, and did not show the issuing organizations qualify as a 'college, university, school, or other institution of learning.'
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not establish that the presented certificates represent 'official academic records' as required, did not corroborate that training certificates do not come with transcripts, and did not show the issuing organizations qualify as a 'college, university, school, or other institution of learning.'