AAO found that the proposed endeavor—teaching communications and working as a PR specialist—did not demonstrate how it would have broader national implications beyond the Petitioner's immediate employers and students. The Petitioner's appeal arguments about expertise and field importance did not address the specific endeavor's broader implications as required by Dhanasar.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the proposed endeavor—teaching communications and working as a PR specialist—did not demonstrate how it would have broader national implications beyond the Petitioner's immediate employers and students. The Petitioner's appeal arguments about expertise and field importance did not address the specific endeavor's broader implications as required by Dhanasar.
AAO concluded the record does not identify any particular process or advancement that would have national or global implications in sales/marketing, and lacks evidence of substantial positive economic effects or location-specific economic impact.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concluded the record does not identify any particular process or advancement that would have national or global implications in sales/marketing, and lacks evidence of substantial positive economic effects or location-specific economic impact.
recognition for achievements and significant contributions
AAO 为什么未被说服
Petitioner relied on expert/recommendation statements, two municipal/national-level awards from 2011 and 2012, four media articles, and authorship of articles and a non-fiction book.…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Petitioner relied on expert/recommendation statements, two municipal/national-level awards from 2011 and 2012, four media articles, and authorship of articles and a non-fiction book. AAO found the awards were city-wide or local-fair recognitions, the media articles either were largely first-person, only briefly mentioned the Petitioner, or did not show recognition by peers, governmental entities, or professional/business organizations, and that authorship without showing recognition for the works does not satisfy this criterion.
ten years of full-time experience (employer letters)
AAO 为什么未被说服
Petitioner raised this criterion for the first time on appeal with only a general reference to the record. The CV showed work as an embroiderer beginning in 2011, less than ten years before the 2019 filing, and the record contained recommendation letters rather than letters from current or former employers as the regulation requires.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Petitioner raised this criterion for the first time on appeal with only a general reference to the record. The CV showed work as an embroiderer beginning in 2011, less than ten years before the 2019 filing, and the record contained recommendation letters rather than letters from current or former employers as the regulation requires.