The AAO found that the proposed endeavor benefits the Petitioner's employer and clients but lacks broader national implications. The Petitioner provided no evidence showing how his specific endeavor would impact the economy or the field beyond his immediate employer and clients, and his general assertions about business productivity and economic activity do not address the specific endeavor's broader implications as require…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found that the proposed endeavor benefits the Petitioner's employer and clients but lacks broader national implications. The Petitioner provided no evidence showing how his specific endeavor would impact the economy or the field beyond his immediate employer and clients, and his general assertions about business productivity and economic activity do not address the specific endeavor's broader implications as required by Dhanasar.
AAO concluded the Petitioner did not show the endeavor has broader implications beyond the Petitioner's own business, did not provide salient details about U.S. worker employment, did not establish specific anticipated positive economic effects, and did not show the effects would be in an economically depressed area.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concluded the Petitioner did not show the endeavor has broader implications beyond the Petitioner's own business, did not provide salient details about U.S. worker employment, did not establish specific anticipated positive economic effects, and did not show the effects would be in an economically depressed area.
AAO found that while the Petitioner's work as a nutritionist has substantial merit, the record did not demonstrate that the prospective impact of her proposed endeavor rises to national importance. Her services would not extend sufficiently beyond her individual customers to broadly impact the nutrition/healthcare field or U.S. economy, and she presented no evidence of significant potential to employ U.S.…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that while the Petitioner's work as a nutritionist has substantial merit, the record did not demonstrate that the prospective impact of her proposed endeavor rises to national importance. Her services would not extend sufficiently beyond her individual customers to broadly impact the nutrition/healthcare field or U.S. economy, and she presented no evidence of significant potential to employ U.S. workers or generate substantial positive economic effects.
AAO agreed with the Director that substantial merit was shown, but found that the Petitioner had not demonstrated national importance. The proposed endeavor lacked evidence of prospective impact beyond his potential employers on the broader U.S. auto industry or economy, and did not show significant potential to employ U.S. workers or produce substantial positive economic effects.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that substantial merit was shown, but found that the Petitioner had not demonstrated national importance. The proposed endeavor lacked evidence of prospective impact beyond his potential employers on the broader U.S. auto industry or economy, and did not show significant potential to employ U.S. workers or produce substantial positive economic effects.