可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 11441–11450

NIWNIW · 国家重要性未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

裁决如何说明

AAO did not reach the merits of prong one, instead remanding for the Director to evaluate the original medical research endeavor under the Dhanasar framework while disregarding the materially changed RFE-response endeavor.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not reach the merits of prong one, instead remanding for the Director to evaluate the original medical research endeavor under the Dhanasar framework while disregarding the materially changed RFE-response endeavor.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-08_02_B5203; source_row=27765
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive job offer requirement

裁决如何说明

AAO explicitly declined to reach the third prong because the Petitioner failed to meet the first prong, rendering further analysis unnecessary.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly declined to reach the third prong because the Petitioner failed to meet the first prong, rendering further analysis unnecessary.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-08_06_B5203; source_row=27779
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO explicitly declined to reach the second prong because the Petitioner failed to meet the first prong, rendering further analysis unnecessary.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly declined to reach the second prong because the Petitioner failed to meet the first prong, rendering further analysis unnecessary.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-08_06_B5203; source_row=27778
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

机械 / 制造工程

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO explicitly declined to reach the second prong because failure under the first prong was dispositive, and further analysis would serve no meaningful purpose.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly declined to reach the second prong because failure under the first prong was dispositive, and further analysis would serve no meaningful purpose.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-08_03_B5203; source_row=27769
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation

证据为何得到认可

AAO found Petitioner established his senior leadership role with the company and submitted sufficient documentation of the company's distinguished reputation in its industry.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found Petitioner established his senior leadership role with the company and submitted sufficient documentation of the company's distinguished reputation in its industry.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-08_02_B2203; source_row=27760
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1Aother保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

other

intent to continue work in area of extraordinary ability

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to reach this issue under Bagamasbad because the initial-evidence failure was dispositive.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to reach this issue under Bagamasbad because the initial-evidence failure was dispositive.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-08_02_B2203; source_row=27763
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance

AAO 为什么未被说服

Although AAO disagreed with the Director's basis for disregarding the expert letters, on de novo review the letters and patents lack specifics demonstrating widespread implementation or major impact beyond the company's own customers and operations.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Although AAO disagreed with the Director's basis for disregarding the expert letters, on de novo review the letters and patents lack specifics demonstrating widespread implementation or major impact beyond the company's own customers and operations.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-08_02_B2203; source_row=27759
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the three-criterion threshold, but noted in dicta that the record would not support a finding of sustained national or international acclaim.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the three-criterion threshold, but noted in dicta that the record would not support a finding of sustained national or international acclaim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-08_01_B2203; source_row=27752
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

证据为何得到认可

Both the Director and AAO agreed the judging criterion was satisfied.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Both the Director and AAO agreed the judging criterion was satisfied.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-08_01_B2203; source_row=27748
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

authorship of scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

Both the Director and AAO agreed the scholarly articles criterion was satisfied.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Both the Director and AAO agreed the scholarly articles criterion was satisfied.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-06-08_01_B2203; source_row=27750
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评