Because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold of three criteria, AAO did not conduct a formal final merits determination, though it noted the aggregate record would not support such a finding.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold of three criteria, AAO did not conduct a formal final merits determination, though it noted the aggregate record would not support such a finding.
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
证据为何得到认可
AAO agreed that the Petitioner's team championship awards and individual awards including the all-star team selection reported in L'Equipe satisfied this criterion.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner's team championship awards and individual awards including the all-star team selection reported in L'Equipe satisfied this criterion.
high salary or remuneration in relation to others in the field
裁决如何说明
AAO noted that the Petitioner's counsel did not contest the Director's findings on this criterion and did not offer additional arguments, and therefore considered the issue abandoned.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO noted that the Petitioner's counsel did not contest the Director's findings on this criterion and did not offer additional arguments, and therefore considered the issue abandoned.
AAO explicitly declined to conduct the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the step-1 threshold of three criteria, but noted in dicta that the record does not support the required acclaim.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly declined to conduct the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the step-1 threshold of three criteria, but noted in dicta that the record does not support the required acclaim.
leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation
证据为何得到认可
AAO found that evidence regarding the Beneficiary's roles with one investment company (establishing it from the ground up, managing 150 employees and 10 billion rubles in assets, award nominations) established a leading role for that organization with a distinguished reputation, though similar evidence for other organizations was insufficient.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that evidence regarding the Beneficiary's roles with one investment company (establishing it from the ground up, managing 150 employees and 10 billion rubles in assets, award nominations) established a leading role for that organization with a distinguished reputation, though similar evidence for other organizations was insufficient.
original contributions of major significance to the field
裁决如何说明
AAO reserved this criterion because the Petitioner could not meet three criteria regardless, making a finding on criterion v unnecessary to the outcome.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved this criterion because the Petitioner could not meet three criteria regardless, making a finding on criterion v unnecessary to the outcome.