The record contains evidence that the Petitioner displayed her work performing at various artistic and musical venues, confirming that she meets the display criterion.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The record contains evidence that the Petitioner displayed her work performing at various artistic and musical venues, confirming that she meets the display criterion.
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold criteria count, but noted in advisory terms that the record does not support sustained national or international acclaim.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold criteria count, but noted in advisory terms that the record does not support sustained national or international acclaim.
AAO noted the Director omitted any determination on this criterion from the final decision despite having indicated in the RFE that it was satisfied, and remanded for a new decision including a determination on this criterion.
为什么值得参考
了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文，以及它在整体记录中说明什么。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO noted the Director omitted any determination on this criterion from the final decision despite having indicated in the RFE that it was satisfied, and remanded for a new decision including a determination on this criterion.
AAO found the Director's analysis inadequate for failing to consider all the evidence and claims, and remanded for re-examination including accompanying explanatory letters.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director's analysis inadequate for failing to consider all the evidence and claims, and remanded for re-examination including accompanying explanatory letters.
AAO found the Director's analysis of this criterion inadequate for failing to discuss the specific evidence, and remanded for re-examination including the Petitioner's accompanying letters.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director's analysis of this criterion inadequate for failing to discuss the specific evidence, and remanded for re-examination including the Petitioner's accompanying letters.