exceptional ability evidentiary criteria (at least 3 of 6)
裁决如何说明
The Petitioner did not contest the Director's findings or argue that he meets at least three of the six criteria on appeal, effectively abandoning this issue.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not contest the Director's findings or argue that he meets at least three of the six criteria on appeal, effectively abandoning this issue.
Ten years of full-time experience in the occupation
AAO 为什么未被说服
The letter from one employer did not state the experience was full-time. Another letter and the Petitioner's own declaration only confirmed full-time work through July 2016, and subsequent consulting work was not shown to be full-time. Collectively the letters did not demonstrate ten years of full-time entrepreneurial experience.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The letter from one employer did not state the experience was full-time. Another letter and the Petitioner's own declaration only confirmed full-time work through July 2016, and subsequent consulting work was not shown to be full-time. Collectively the letters did not demonstrate ten years of full-time entrepreneurial experience.
Recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field
AAO 为什么未被说服
The certificate and city council letter reflected only local recognition from a Brazilian municipality and did not demonstrate broader industry impact. The recommendation letters discussed the Petitioner's work for employers and clients but did not show achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field beyond his immediate employers and clientele.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The certificate and city council letter reflected only local recognition from a Brazilian municipality and did not demonstrate broader industry impact. The recommendation letters discussed the Petitioner's work for employers and clients but did not show achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field beyond his immediate employers and clientele.
Official academic record showing degree, diploma, or certificate
AAO 为什么未被说服
The academic transcript showed completed courses but not a degree, diploma, or certificate. The computer skills certificate was not an official academic record, and the issuing institution was not shown to be a qualifying institution of learning.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The academic transcript showed completed courses but not a degree, diploma, or certificate. The computer skills certificate was not an official academic record, and the issuing institution was not shown to be a qualifying institution of learning.
The AAO found willfulness based on the Petitioner's failure to assert innocent belief or explain possession of the plagiarized books, her withdrawal without rebuttal, and her signed perjury certification on Form I-140.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found willfulness based on the Petitioner's failure to assert innocent belief or explain possession of the plagiarized books, her withdrawal without rebuttal, and her signed perjury certification on Form I-140.
The books were submitted to show exceptional ability in the arts and that the Petitioner was well positioned to advance her proposed endeavor under Dhanasar, directly bearing on her eligibility under section 203(b)(2) of the Act.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The books were submitted to show exceptional ability in the arts and that the Petitioner was well positioned to advance her proposed endeavor under Dhanasar, directly bearing on her eligibility under section 203(b)(2) of the Act.
The Petitioner submitted three books she falsely claimed to have authored as evidence of exceptional ability, constituting a false representation to a government official.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner submitted three books she falsely claimed to have authored as evidence of exceptional ability, constituting a false representation to a government official.
AAO declined to reach the third prong because the Petitioner failed to establish the national importance requirement of the first prong, making further analysis unnecessary.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to reach the third prong because the Petitioner failed to establish the national importance requirement of the first prong, making further analysis unnecessary.