可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 11791–11800

EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

生物医学 / 生命科学20 篇论文13 次审稿

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published material about the person

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO previously found this criterion not met and the petitioner did not successfully challenge this on motion.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO previously found this criterion not met and the petitioner did not successfully challenge this on motion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-04-15_03_B2203; source_row=27353
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

生物医学 / 生命科学20 篇论文13 次审稿

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role

裁决如何说明

The petitioner stated she was not conceding this criterion on motion and requested review; however, AAO did not separately address it in the motion decision, as the step-1 threshold was met on other grounds.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The petitioner stated she was not conceding this criterion on motion and requested review; however, AAO did not separately address it in the motion decision, as the step-1 threshold was met on other grounds.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-04-15_03_B2203; source_row=27354
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

生物医学 / 生命科学20 篇论文13 次审稿

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

authorship of scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

Both the director and AAO in the prior appeal found the scholarly articles criterion satisfied. This finding was not disturbed on motion.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Both the director and AAO in the prior appeal found the scholarly articles criterion satisfied. This finding was not disturbed on motion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-04-15_03_B2203; source_row=27352
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

生物医学 / 生命科学20 篇论文13 次审稿

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

证据为何得到认可

Both the director and AAO in the prior appeal found the judging criterion satisfied based on peer review activities. This finding was not disturbed on motion.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Both the director and AAO in the prior appeal found the judging criterion satisfied based on peer review activities. This finding was not disturbed on motion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-04-15_03_B2203; source_row=27350
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO explicitly declined to conduct a final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three evidentiary criteria, though AAO noted in advisory dicta that the record would not support a finding of extraordinary ability.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly declined to conduct a final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three evidentiary criteria, though AAO noted in advisory dicta that the record would not support a finding of extraordinary ability.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-04-15_04_B2203; source_row=27370
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner did not address on appeal the Director's conclusion regarding the third prong, which was dispositive.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not address on appeal the Director's conclusion regarding the third prong, which was dispositive.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-04-14_01_B5203; source_row=27324
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner did not address on appeal the Director's conclusion that the proposed endeavor lacks national importance; the brief mentions in the exhibits did not elaborate on how the work rose to the level of national importance.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not address on appeal the Director's conclusion that the proposed endeavor lacks national importance; the brief mentions in the exhibits did not elaborate on how the work rose to the level of national importance.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-04-14_01_B5203; source_row=27322
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

other

five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience

AAO 为什么未被说服

The AAO accepted the new provisional certificate as establishing the bachelor-equivalent and the 14 months of Pakistani experience, but found unresolved inconsistencies regarding the Beneficiary's U.S. employment from May 2005 through December 2006, including his prior labor-certification attestation of unemployment from May to October 2006, leaving him short of the required five years.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO accepted the new provisional certificate as establishing the bachelor-equivalent and the 14 months of Pakistani experience, but found unresolved inconsistencies regarding the Beneficiary's U.S. employment from May 2005 through December 2006, including his prior labor-certification attestation of unemployment from May to October 2006, leaving him short of the required five years.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-04-14_03_B5203; source_row=27328
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

other

job's need for an advanced degree professional

AAO 为什么未被说服

The plain language of part H.14 controls and is not limited to foreign bachelor's plus master's combinations; it allows any combination of credentials, so the position does not require an advanced degree professional. The president's affidavit and recruitment ads do not show rejection of applicants with combinations of lesser credentials.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The plain language of part H.14 controls and is not limited to foreign bachelor's plus master's combinations; it allows any combination of credentials, so the position does not require an advanced degree professional. The president's affidavit and recruitment ads do not show rejection of applicants with combinations of lesser credentials.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-04-14_03_B5203; source_row=27329
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO did not reach the second prong because dismissal rested on the Petitioner's failure to address the dispositive first and third prongs.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not reach the second prong because dismissal rested on the Petitioner's failure to address the dispositive first and third prongs.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-04-14_01_B5203; source_row=27323
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评