AAO agreed that the Petitioner failed to show national importance. Her statements reflect intention to continue working in her field but do not demonstrate the prospective impact of her endeavor rises to the level of national importance, nor that it would extend beyond her future employers and clients to impact U.S. interests or the financial industry more broadly.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner failed to show national importance. Her statements reflect intention to continue working in her field but do not demonstrate the prospective impact of her endeavor rises to the level of national importance, nor that it would extend beyond her future employers and clients to impact U.S. interests or the financial industry more broadly.
AAO did not separately address prong two, noting it agreed with the Director's ultimate conclusions and was remanding the threshold EB-2 qualification issue.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not separately address prong two, noting it agreed with the Director's ultimate conclusions and was remanding the threshold EB-2 qualification issue.
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement
裁决如何说明
AAO did not separately address prong three, noting it agreed with the Director's ultimate conclusions and was remanding the threshold EB-2 qualification issue.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not separately address prong three, noting it agreed with the Director's ultimate conclusions and was remanding the threshold EB-2 qualification issue.
AAO found that the employment agreement is inconsistent with an intent to employ permanently and that the record lacks independent, objective evidence of permanent full-time intent; the evidence suggests the work could be cancelled at any time with 10 days' notice.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the employment agreement is inconsistent with an intent to employ permanently and that the record lacks independent, objective evidence of permanent full-time intent; the evidence suggests the work could be cancelled at any time with 10 days' notice.
AAO agreed the record was insufficient but found the Director failed to explain the relevance of the start-date inconsistencies to the bona fides question, and identified additional unresolved issues (multi-entity staffing chain, missing recruitment records, missing PWD copy) requiring remand for further evidence development.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the record was insufficient but found the Director failed to explain the relevance of the start-date inconsistencies to the bona fides question, and identified additional unresolved issues (multi-entity staffing chain, missing recruitment records, missing PWD copy) requiring remand for further evidence development.
The submitted memberships either belong to entities rather than the Petitioner, are not shown to be professional associations requiring a baccalaureate or equivalent, or are unrelated to her occupation (such as the Florida Sheriff's Association).
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The submitted memberships either belong to entities rather than the Petitioner, are not shown to be professional associations requiring a baccalaureate or equivalent, or are unrelated to her occupation (such as the Florida Sheriff's Association).
letters showing 10 years full-time experience in the proposed occupation
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner did not provide sufficient evidence that her positions were full-time or related to the position of general and operations manager for which she is being sought.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not provide sufficient evidence that her positions were full-time or related to the position of general and operations manager for which she is being sought.
AAO reserves Dhanasar prong 1 because the EB-2 classification failure is dispositive, though it observes the evidence does not show national importance.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserves Dhanasar prong 1 because the EB-2 classification failure is dispositive, though it observes the evidence does not show national importance.