AAO found that based on the Beneficiary's Bachelor of Technology and Post-Graduate Diploma in Management, along with the equivalency evaluation, the Beneficiary met the minimum educational requirement of the labor certification and the EB-2 advanced degree professional classification.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that based on the Beneficiary's Bachelor of Technology and Post-Graduate Diploma in Management, along with the equivalency evaluation, the Beneficiary met the minimum educational requirement of the labor certification and the EB-2 advanced degree professional classification.
AAO agreed with the Director that the Beneficiary's authorship of scholarly articles was established, though noted only one article relates to the Beneficiary's current field of radiology.
为什么值得参考
了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文，以及它在整体记录中说明什么。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Beneficiary's authorship of scholarly articles was established, though noted only one article relates to the Beneficiary's current field of radiology.
published material about the alien in professional or major media
裁决如何说明
The AAO reserved the published-material criterion because detailed discussion of it could not change the outcome of the appeal given the Petitioner already failed to meet the three-criteria threshold.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO reserved the published-material criterion because detailed discussion of it could not change the outcome of the appeal given the Petitioner already failed to meet the three-criteria threshold.
The AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in passing that the record does not demonstrate the required acclaim.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three criteria, but noted in passing that the record does not demonstrate the required acclaim.
admissibility under section 212(a)(5)(B) / national or international renown exemption under section 101(a)(41)
裁决如何说明
AAO did not resolve the merits of the renown-physician exemption; it withdrew the Director's decision and remanded for further proceedings and a new decision.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not resolve the merits of the renown-physician exemption; it withdrew the Director's decision and remanded for further proceedings and a new decision.
AAO determined that 'data scientists' was the most accurate occupational match for the Beneficiary, and using county-level careeronestop.org data for that occupation showed her $160,000 salary was above average but below the 90th percentile ($192,240), thus not high relative to similarly situated scientists.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO determined that 'data scientists' was the most accurate occupational match for the Beneficiary, and using county-level careeronestop.org data for that occupation showed her $160,000 salary was above average but below the 90th percentile ($192,240), thus not high relative to similarly situated scientists.
While acknowledging the originality of the Beneficiary's work, AAO found that the record did not establish it was of major significance. Her contributions to the weather model were among many updates by numerous researchers, her Google Scholar citations lacked comparative context, and the evidence did not show her work widely impacted others in her specific field.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
While acknowledging the originality of the Beneficiary's work, AAO found that the record did not establish it was of major significance. Her contributions to the weather model were among many updates by numerous researchers, her Google Scholar citations lacked comparative context, and the evidence did not show her work widely impacted others in her specific field.
AAO agreed that the peer review emails showing the Beneficiary actually completed reviews for journals such as Agronomy, Sustainability, and Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan established this criterion.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the peer review emails showing the Beneficiary actually completed reviews for journals such as Agronomy, Sustainability, and Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan established this criterion.