On de novo review, AAO found the petitioner well positioned, citing supportive letters from medical school faculty and research leadership, and substantial research funding from the Gates Foundation, Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, and the Japanese Ministry of Education.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
On de novo review, AAO found the petitioner well positioned, citing supportive letters from medical school faculty and research leadership, and substantial research funding from the Gates Foundation, Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, and the Japanese Ministry of Education.
license or certification (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(C))
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner did not demonstrate that receiving a certificate from ABADA-Capoeira at the International Festival of Capoeira Art is equivalent to 'certification for a particular occupation.' AAO noted that capoeira belts are not standardized and are based on a master's subjective judgment rather than defined requirements.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not demonstrate that receiving a certificate from ABADA-Capoeira at the International Festival of Capoeira Art is equivalent to 'certification for a particular occupation.' AAO noted that capoeira belts are not standardized and are based on a master's subjective judgment rather than defined requirements.
official academic record (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(A))
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner failed to establish that the issuing entities qualify as a 'college, university, school or other institution of learning' or that any of the documents constitute an 'official academic record' as required by the criterion.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner failed to establish that the issuing entities qualify as a 'college, university, school or other institution of learning' or that any of the documents constitute an 'official academic record' as required by the criterion.
recognition for achievements and significant contributions (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(F))
AAO 为什么未被说服
The letter from ABADA-Capoeira's president praised the Petitioner generally and confirmed his practice and teaching history, but did not establish what influence he has had on the sport of capoeira as a whole, as required by the regulation.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The letter from ABADA-Capoeira's president praised the Petitioner generally and confirmed his practice and teaching history, but did not establish what influence he has had on the sport of capoeira as a whole, as required by the regulation.
evidence of at least ten years of full-time experience (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(B))
证据为何得到认可
AAO accepted the Director's finding that the Petitioner met this criterion, referencing it only obliquely in the context of noting the Director's decision was unclear about criterion (F).
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO accepted the Director's finding that the Petitioner met this criterion, referencing it only obliquely in the context of noting the Director's decision was unclear about criterion (F).