可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 12131–12140

EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他硕士

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

证据为何得到认可

AAO adopted the Director's finding that criterion (i) was satisfied and declined to disturb it.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO adopted the Director's finding that criterion (i) was satisfied and declined to disturb it.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-01-29_02_B2203; source_row=26875
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role for organizations with a distinguished reputation

裁决如何说明

AAO did not revisit the Director's finding on criterion (viii) in the appeal analysis. The decision focuses only on criteria (i), (vii), and (ix) as contested issues, and (iii) as waived. AAO's conclusion that fewer than three criteria are met implicitly withdraws this finding as well, or treats it as insufficient alongside the others.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not revisit the Director's finding on criterion (viii) in the appeal analysis. The decision focuses only on criteria (i), (vii), and (ix) as contested issues, and (iii) as waived. AAO's conclusion that fewer than three criteria are met implicitly withdraws this finding as well, or treats it as insufficient alongside the others.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-01-29_08_B2203; source_row=26902
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not satisfy the initial evidentiary threshold of at least three criteria. AAO noted in dicta that the record does not support the required acclaim.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not satisfy the initial evidentiary threshold of at least three criteria. AAO noted in dicta that the record does not support the required acclaim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-01-29_08_B2203; source_row=26904
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published materials in professional or major trade publications or other major media

裁决如何说明

The Petitioner did not address the Director's determination regarding this criterion on appeal, so it is deemed waived.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not address the Director's determination regarding this criterion on appeal, so it is deemed waived.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-01-29_08_B2203; source_row=26900
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

prizes or awards

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed with the Director that the prizes or awards criterion was satisfied.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the prizes or awards criterion was satisfied.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-01-29_06_B2203; source_row=26888
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role for distinguished organizations

AAO 为什么未被说服

Two letters contained lengthy identical passages, undermining their reliability as firsthand accounts; without probative evidence, the Petitioner did not establish acclaim from this role.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Two letters contained lengthy identical passages, undermining their reliability as firsthand accounts; without probative evidence, the Petitioner did not establish acclaim from this role.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-01-29_06_B2203; source_row=26892
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学经理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

participation as a judge of the work of others

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed the Petitioner met this criterion through his service as a judge in several business competitions.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the Petitioner met this criterion through his service as a judge in several business competitions.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-01-29_12_B2203; source_row=26924
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学经理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published material in professional publications or major media

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed the Petitioner met this criterion through the Kommersant article.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the Petitioner met this criterion through the Kommersant article.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-01-29_12_B2203; source_row=26923
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学经理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

裁决如何说明

AAO did not separately address this criterion, noting the petitioner's appeal did not specify which criteria he was contesting and deferring analysis to the final merits.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not separately address this criterion, noting the petitioner's appeal did not specify which criteria he was contesting and deferring analysis to the final merits.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-01-29_12_B2203; source_row=26922
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学经理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role for an organization with a distinguished reputation

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed the Petitioner met this criterion as the leader of a company with a distinguished reputation.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the Petitioner met this criterion as the leader of a company with a distinguished reputation.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-01-29_12_B2203; source_row=26927
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评