可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 12141–12150

EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床65 篇论文385 次引用

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

participation as a judge of the work of others

证据为何得到认可

The AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner satisfied the judging criterion.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner satisfied the judging criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-01-29_10_B2203; source_row=26911
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 高薪酬已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

EB-1A · 高薪酬

high salary or other significantly high remuneration in relation to others in the field

证据为何得到认可

AAO affirmed the Director's finding that the high salary criterion was met.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO affirmed the Director's finding that the high salary criterion was met.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-01-29_07_B2203; source_row=26897
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO explicitly stated it need not conduct a final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the required number of criteria. It did note in dicta that the record does not establish the required acclaim.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly stated it need not conduct a final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the required number of criteria. It did note in dicta that the record does not establish the required acclaim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-01-29_07_B2203; source_row=26898
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role for distinguished organizations or establishments

证据为何得到认可

AAO affirmed the Director's finding that this criterion was met, consistent with letters from employers establishing the Petitioner's critical capacity.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO affirmed the Director's finding that this criterion was met, consistent with letters from employers establishing the Petitioner's critical capacity.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-01-29_07_B2203; source_row=26896
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

authorship of scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

AAO previously affirmed that the Petitioner met the authorship criterion; this was not at issue on motion.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO previously affirmed that the Petitioner met the authorship criterion; this was not at issue on motion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-01-29_09_B2203; source_row=26909
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

participation as a judge of the work of others

证据为何得到认可

AAO previously withdrew the Director's finding because the original evidence (an invitation and reminder e-mail) did not show completed peer review. New evidence on motion documents that the Petitioner completed peer review activities for the journals, satisfying the criterion.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO previously withdrew the Director's finding because the original evidence (an invitation and reminder e-mail) did not show completed peer review. New evidence on motion documents that the Petitioner completed peer review activities for the journals, satisfying the criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-01-29_09_B2203; source_row=26907
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

裁决如何说明

The Petitioner did not contest AAO's prior determination that he failed to satisfy this criterion.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not contest AAO's prior determination that he failed to satisfy this criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-01-29_09_B2203; source_row=26905
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published material about the petitioner in major media

裁决如何说明

The Petitioner did not contest AAO's prior determination that he failed to satisfy this criterion on motion.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not contest AAO's prior determination that he failed to satisfy this criterion on motion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-01-29_09_B2203; source_row=26906
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1Aother保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

other

continued work in the area of extraordinary ability

裁决如何说明

AAO agreed there are substantial concerns about the bona fides of the contract (including a clause voiding it if no extraordinary-ability visa is obtained, and a short term ending January 1, 2020), but found the Director's reasons were not stated with sufficient specificity to allow a meaningful response.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed there are substantial concerns about the bona fides of the contract (including a clause voiding it if no extraordinary-ability visa is obtained, and a short term ending January 1, 2020), but found the Director's reasons were not stated with sufficient specificity to allow a meaningful response.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-01-29_03_B2203; source_row=26880
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination - sustained national or international acclaim

裁决如何说明

AAO rejected the Petitioner's reading of Kazarian but also found the Director's final merits analysis deficient for focusing on quantity rather than content of evidence; the issue is remanded for further analysis.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO rejected the Petitioner's reading of Kazarian but also found the Director's final merits analysis deficient for focusing on quantity rather than content of evidence; the issue is remanded for further analysis.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2021-01-29_03_B2203; source_row=26879
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评