AAO agreed the proposed endeavor has substantial merit and national importance, citing letters from professors and industry executives describing impact on the field and broader dissemination through journals and conferences.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the proposed endeavor has substantial merit and national importance, citing letters from professors and industry executives describing impact on the field and broader dissemination through journals and conferences.
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's proposed work involving instructional design and research has substantial merit and national importance, supported by reference letters and dissemination of research through journals and conferences. However, his teaching component alone did not have national importance.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's proposed work involving instructional design and research has substantial merit and national importance, supported by reference letters and dissemination of research through journals and conferences. However, his teaching component alone did not have national importance.
recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner's brief did not reference the Director's discussion of this criterion nor identify any specific error, failing to overcome the Director's finding.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner's brief did not reference the Director's discussion of this criterion nor identify any specific error, failing to overcome the Director's finding.
official academic record showing degree relating to area of exceptional ability
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner did not specifically identify any erroneous conclusion of law or fact regarding this criterion, effectively failing to overcome the Director's finding.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not specifically identify any erroneous conclusion of law or fact regarding this criterion, effectively failing to overcome the Director's finding.
AAO agreed the proffered position was more consistent with a preschool teacher than a curriculum specialist. The Beneficiary's job duties—curriculum development, scheduling, observation and reporting on children—closely matched the OOH description of preschool teachers, which require only an associate's degree. The Petitioner failed to resolve inconsistencies regarding job title, duties, and full-time vs.…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the proffered position was more consistent with a preschool teacher than a curriculum specialist. The Beneficiary's job duties—curriculum development, scheduling, observation and reporting on children—closely matched the OOH description of preschool teachers, which require only an associate's degree. The Petitioner failed to resolve inconsistencies regarding job title, duties, and full-time vs. part-time status, and never provided the requested duty-time breakdown.
AAO noted that the Director's revocation decision did not include definitive findings of fact or conclusions of law, and that every PERM petitioner identifies a foreign national prior to required recruitment, which does not by itself indicate the job is not open to U.S. workers. AAO declined to make its own finding absent a proper Director determination.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO noted that the Director's revocation decision did not include definitive findings of fact or conclusions of law, and that every PERM petitioner identifies a foreign national prior to required recruitment, which does not by itself indicate the job is not open to U.S. workers. AAO declined to make its own finding absent a proper Director determination.