published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media
AAO 为什么未被说服
The articles were about competitions and merely listed the Petitioner's name among dozens of competitors, meaning they were not 'about' him as required by regulation. Additionally, neither the web analytics ranking nor any evidence for culturismoweb.com established that the publications were major media.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The articles were about competitions and merely listed the Petitioner's name among dozens of competitors, meaning they were not 'about' him as required by regulation. Additionally, neither the web analytics ranking nor any evidence for culturismoweb.com established that the publications were major media.
AAO agreed that the labor certification's alternate education requirement — a combination of college-level degrees equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree — permits qualification with less than a full bachelor's degree (e.g., two associate's degrees), and therefore does not support advanced degree professional classification.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the labor certification's alternate education requirement — a combination of college-level degrees equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree — permits qualification with less than a full bachelor's degree (e.g., two associate's degrees), and therefore does not support advanced degree professional classification.
AAO explicitly declined to reach this issue, citing that the labor certification deficiency was dispositive and made resolution of the Beneficiary's individual qualifications unnecessary.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly declined to reach this issue, citing that the labor certification deficiency was dispositive and made resolution of the Beneficiary's individual qualifications unnecessary.
AAO found that the Petitioner's first-place finish at the IFBB Central American and Caribbean Fitness Championships satisfies the plain language of the criterion, reversing the prior adverse finding on this criterion.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Petitioner's first-place finish at the IFBB Central American and Caribbean Fitness Championships satisfies the plain language of the criterion, reversing the prior adverse finding on this criterion.
Federal agency or state department of public health determination that work is in the public interest
证据为何得到认可
The April 2019 letter submitted on appeal expressly attested that the Petitioner's work was in the public interest, and together with the initial letter, satisfied the requirements of section 203(b)(2)(B)(ii)(I)(bb) and 8 C.F.R. § 204.12(c)(3).
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The April 2019 letter submitted on appeal expressly attested that the Petitioner's work was in the public interest, and together with the initial letter, satisfied the requirements of section 203(b)(2)(B)(ii)(I)(bb) and 8 C.F.R. § 204.12(c)(3).
The new letter from the federation official did not elaborate on the selection process for the national team and did not establish that membership requires outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts. The letter's claims about the Petitioner winning a gold medal at a 2014 world championship were unsupported by the record evidence.…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The new letter from the federation official did not elaborate on the selection process for the national team and did not establish that membership requires outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts. The letter's claims about the Petitioner winning a gold medal at a 2014 world championship were unsupported by the record evidence. The television appearance post-dated the petition filing by nearly two years and could not establish eligibility at time of filing. No new evidence overcame any previously unmet criterion.
Although the Petitioner submitted a statement, he did not contend that AAO misapplied law or USCIS policy in its prior decision and did not directly address the conclusions reached in that prior decision. Merely repeating prior arguments does not satisfy the requirements for reconsideration.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Although the Petitioner submitted a statement, he did not contend that AAO misapplied law or USCIS policy in its prior decision and did not directly address the conclusions reached in that prior decision. Merely repeating prior arguments does not satisfy the requirements for reconsideration.
AAO agreed that qualifying evidence exists, including interviews in the Slovenian newspaper Delo, the Swiss newspaper La Tribune de Geneve, and the Spanish magazine El Cultural, notwithstanding that much submitted evidence lacked required identifying information or had only partial translations.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that qualifying evidence exists, including interviews in the Slovenian newspaper Delo, the Swiss newspaper La Tribune de Geneve, and the Spanish magazine El Cultural, notwithstanding that much submitted evidence lacked required identifying information or had only partial translations.