可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 12441–12450

EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

金融

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging the work of others

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's participation as a judge for multiple awards programs satisfied this criterion.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's participation as a judge for multiple awards programs satisfied this criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-11-24_05_B2203; source_row=26544
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

金融

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO did not conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three evidentiary criteria, though it noted in advisory fashion that the record does not support the required level of acclaim.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold of three evidentiary criteria, though it noted in advisory fashion that the record does not support the required level of acclaim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-11-24_05_B2203; source_row=26546
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

金融

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's critical contributions to NERC, a distinguished public agency, satisfied this criterion.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's critical contributions to NERC, a distinguished public agency, satisfied this criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-11-24_05_B2203; source_row=26545
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

other

Bona fide employer-employee relationship

证据为何得到认可

AAO reviewed the full record and found it more likely than not that the Beneficiary will be employed by the Petitioner, reversing the Director's denial.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reviewed the full record and found it more likely than not that the Beneficiary will be employed by the Petitioner, reversing the Director's denial.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-11-23_01_B5203; source_row=26521
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

AAO 为什么未被说服

The IIMS's own website shows that full membership requires only five years of experience as a marine surveyor or consultant, which does not constitute an outstanding achievement, and the Petitioner did not show that the Professional Assessment Committee consists of recognized national or international experts.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The IIMS's own website shows that full membership requires only five years of experience as a marine surveyor or consultant, which does not constitute an outstanding achievement, and the Petitioner did not show that the Professional Assessment Committee consists of recognized national or international experts.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-10-20_01_B2203; source_row=26514
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner failed to show that his work recovering a fishing company was a contribution in the field of maritime surveying and consulting. On appeal, he discussed the economic importance of the company but did not address the fundamental gap between his executive work and his claimed field.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner failed to show that his work recovering a fishing company was a contribution in the field of maritime surveying and consulting. On appeal, he discussed the economic importance of the company but did not address the fundamental gap between his executive work and his claimed field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-10-20_01_B2203; source_row=26516
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner did not receive the Honorary Helmsman Award until December 2018, nearly two months after filing the petition in October 2018. Because petitioners must meet eligibility requirements at the time of filing, the award cannot establish eligibility regardless of its national or international recognition.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not receive the Honorary Helmsman Award until December 2018, nearly two months after filing the petition in October 2018. Because petitioners must meet eligibility requirements at the time of filing, the award cannot establish eligibility regardless of its national or international recognition.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-10-20_01_B2203; source_row=26513
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

authorship of scholarly articles

裁决如何说明

The Petitioner did not contest the Director's conclusions regarding criterion (vi) on appeal, so AAO considered that issue abandoned.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not contest the Director's conclusions regarding criterion (vi) on appeal, so AAO considered that issue abandoned.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-10-20_01_B2203; source_row=26517
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed step one, but noted in dicta that the record does not support the required acclaim.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed step one, but noted in dicta that the record does not support the required acclaim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-10-20_01_B2203; source_row=26520
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published material about the alien in professional or major media

AAO 为什么未被说服

The articles focus on the fishing company rather than on the Petitioner himself, and they do not relate to his work as a master mariner or specialist surveyor — the fields in which he claims extraordinary ability. The articles are at best tangential to his claimed areas of extraordinary ability.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The articles focus on the fishing company rather than on the Petitioner himself, and they do not relate to his work as a master mariner or specialist surveyor — the fields in which he claims extraordinary ability. The articles are at best tangential to his claimed areas of extraordinary ability.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-10-20_01_B2203; source_row=26515
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评