AAO previously found that the White House Fact Sheet and DOE article helped show the substantial merit and national importance of the Petitioner's proposed work.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO previously found that the White House Fact Sheet and DOE article helped show the substantial merit and national importance of the Petitioner's proposed work.
AAO finds the Petitioner documented both substantial merit and national importance of his wind erosion research, including impacts on agriculture, public health, and air quality.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO finds the Petitioner documented both substantial merit and national importance of his wind erosion research, including impacts on agriculture, public health, and air quality.
submission of completed ETA 9089 for Schedule A occupation
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO agrees with the Director that the Petitioner failed to submit a completed ETA 9089, which is required for Schedule A petitions, and notes additional deficiencies including a posting notice that does not list minimum requirements and job duties that do not match the prevailing wage determination.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agrees with the Director that the Petitioner failed to submit a completed ETA 9089, which is required for Schedule A petitions, and notes additional deficiencies including a posting notice that does not list minimum requirements and job duties that do not match the prevailing wage determination.
original contributions of major significance in the field
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner's evidence showed the Beneficiary made valuable contributions to his employer's products and customers, but did not establish that those contributions had an impact beyond the employer and its clients rising to the level of major significance in the power electronics field.…
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner's evidence showed the Beneficiary made valuable contributions to his employer's products and customers, but did not establish that those contributions had an impact beyond the employer and its clients rising to the level of major significance in the power electronics field. Claims of competitor adoption were unsupported, application notes were routine job duties, citation counts were modest, and counsel's assertions lacked evidentiary support.
The article about the Petitioner was published more than one year after the petition was filed, and the Petitioner submitted no evidence of published materials about her prior to the May 2017 filing date, failing the filing-date eligibility requirement.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The article about the Petitioner was published more than one year after the petition was filed, and the Petitioner submitted no evidence of published materials about her prior to the May 2017 filing date, failing the filing-date eligibility requirement.
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
AAO 为什么未被说服
SMA membership is open to any individual who wishes to subscribe to the association's purposes; WAOFP evidence only states members have 'demonstrated success in their career pursuits'; no evidence was provided for WISE membership requirements. Additionally, SMA and WISE memberships were approved approximately one year after the petition was filed, failing the filing-date eligibility requirement.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
SMA membership is open to any individual who wishes to subscribe to the association's purposes; WAOFP evidence only states members have 'demonstrated success in their career pursuits'; no evidence was provided for WISE membership requirements. Additionally, SMA and WISE memberships were approved approximately one year after the petition was filed, failing the filing-date eligibility requirement.
high salary or remuneration in relation to others in the field
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner submitted a Glassdoor geographical compensation survey for the first time on appeal, but AAO will not accept evidence offered for the first time on appeal when the petitioner was previously put on notice of the deficiency and had an opportunity to respond.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner submitted a Glassdoor geographical compensation survey for the first time on appeal, but AAO will not accept evidence offered for the first time on appeal when the petitioner was previously put on notice of the deficiency and had an opportunity to respond.