可追溯来源的裁决研究
从大量个案裁决理由中检索，再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。
本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录，而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误；标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率，也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。
10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定
当前显示 12501–12510
案件事实
审查的问题
Membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
裁决如何说明
AAO did not separately adjudicate this criterion on appeal.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
AAO did not separately adjudicate this criterion on appeal.
案件事实
审查的问题
Published material about the alien in professional publications or major media
裁决如何说明
AAO noted the Director's failure to address RFE evidence but did not itself adjudicate whether the criterion was met, remanding for further review.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
AAO noted the Director's failure to address RFE evidence but did not itself adjudicate whether the criterion was met, remanding for further review.
案件事实
审查的问题
Original contributions of major significance
裁决如何说明
AAO disagreed with the Director's dismissal of patent evidence, noting the patent review process is designed to ensure only original innovations receive protection, but remanded rather than making its own final determination.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
AAO disagreed with the Director's dismissal of patent evidence, noting the patent review process is designed to ensure only original innovations receive protection, but remanded rather than making its own final determination.
案件事实
审查的问题
participation as a judge of the work of others
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO disagreed with the Director, finding inconsistencies between the initial list of invited guests and the chair's letter, an incomplete translation, and insufficient documentation regarding the nature of the events judged. The 2014 invitation referred to the Petitioner by an unclaimed CEO title and the supporting letters lacked corroborating documentation.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
AAO disagreed with the Director, finding inconsistencies between the initial list of invited guests and the chair's letter, an incomplete translation, and insufficient documentation regarding the nature of the events judged. The 2014 invitation referred to the Petitioner by an unclaimed CEO title and the supporting letters lacked corroborating documentation.
案件事实
审查的问题
leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputations
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found the stock-price screenshots failed to establish distinguished reputation for either company addressed on appeal, and the employer letters lacked the specific detail needed to show the Petitioner's contributions had significant impact on the organizations' outcomes.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
AAO found the stock-price screenshots failed to establish distinguished reputation for either company addressed on appeal, and the employer letters lacked the specific detail needed to show the Petitioner's contributions had significant impact on the organizations' outcomes.
案件事实
审查的问题
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found neither article identified an author as required, and the only evidence supporting World Journal's circulation was Wikipedia, which is unreliable. Petitioner did not contest the Director's determination regarding The China Press.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
AAO found neither article identified an author as required, and the only evidence supporting World Journal's circulation was Wikipedia, which is unreliable. Petitioner did not contest the Director's determination regarding The China Press.
案件事实
审查的问题
final merits determination
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO conducted an aggregate review and found the record does not show sustained acclaim or that the Petitioner has risen to the very top of the field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
AAO conducted an aggregate review and found the record does not show sustained acclaim or that the Petitioner has risen to the very top of the field.
案件事实
审查的问题
published material about the alien in professional or major media
证据为何得到认可
The record supports the Director's conclusion that the Petitioner demonstrated widespread national media coverage for his athletic achievements.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
The record supports the Director's conclusion that the Petitioner demonstrated widespread national media coverage for his athletic achievements.
案件事实
审查的问题
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations or establishments
裁决如何说明
AAO did not address this criterion because at least three other criteria were already established, making further analysis unnecessary.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
AAO did not address this criterion because at least three other criteria were already established, making further analysis unnecessary.
案件事实
审查的问题
membership in associations that require outstanding achievements
证据为何得到认可
AAO found that membership on the Olympic teams required attaining outstanding achievements by meeting world-class standards as determined by IAAF international experts and approved by the International Olympic Committee, thereby satisfying the membership criterion.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
AAO found that membership on the Olympic teams required attaining outstanding achievements by meeting world-class standards as determined by IAAF international experts and approved by the International Olympic Committee, thereby satisfying the membership criterion.