high salary or other significantly high remuneration
证据为何得到认可
AAO found the evidence reflects the Petitioner was a full-time salaried employee in 2018 and last worked freelance in 2004, contradicting the Director's freelance finding. AAO also found that comparison to top-level earners is not required at step one but is appropriate for final merits.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the evidence reflects the Petitioner was a full-time salaried employee in 2018 and last worked freelance in 2004, contradicting the Director's freelance finding. AAO also found that comparison to top-level earners is not required at step one but is appropriate for final merits.
AAO found that while the articles publicized the Petitioner's hiring, they provide sufficient information relating to her and her work to satisfy the plain language of the criterion. AAO agreed that not all four publications were established as major media but found that articles from Deadline Hollywood and Broadcast magazine meet all requirements.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that while the articles publicized the Petitioner's hiring, they provide sufficient information relating to her and her work to satisfy the plain language of the criterion. AAO agreed that not all four publications were established as major media but found that articles from Deadline Hollywood and Broadcast magazine meet all requirements.
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations or establishments
证据为何得到认可
AAO agreed that some testimonial evidence lacked sufficient detail about specific roles, but found the Petitioner demonstrated a leading role as Executive Vice President for her current employer and established that employer's distinguished reputation.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that some testimonial evidence lacked sufficient detail about specific roles, but found the Petitioner demonstrated a leading role as Executive Vice President for her current employer and established that employer's distinguished reputation.
AAO faulted the Director for stating no evidence was provided when the RFE itself acknowledged evidence under this criterion. Remanded for proper consideration.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO faulted the Director for stating no evidence was provided when the RFE itself acknowledged evidence under this criterion. Remanded for proper consideration.
AAO agreed the work has substantial merit but found the record insufficient to show the prospective impact of her proposed endeavor would extend beyond her own company and clientele to broadly affect the relevant industries or the national economy at the level of national importance required under Dhanasar.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the work has substantial merit but found the record insufficient to show the prospective impact of her proposed endeavor would extend beyond her own company and clientele to broadly affect the relevant industries or the national economy at the level of national importance required under Dhanasar.
Director's RFE stated this criterion was met, but the final decision neither counted it nor explained a contrary conclusion. AAO remands for the Director to determine whether this criterion is satisfied.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Director's RFE stated this criterion was met, but the final decision neither counted it nor explained a contrary conclusion. AAO remands for the Director to determine whether this criterion is satisfied.