可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 12701–12710

EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

authorship of scholarly articles in professional publications

裁决如何说明

The Petitioner did not contest AAO's previous findings regarding this criterion; AAO considered the issue waived.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not contest AAO's previous findings regarding this criterion; AAO considered the issue waived.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-25_07_B2203; source_row=26249
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging the work of others in the field

证据为何得到认可

AAO previously agreed that the Petitioner had served as a judge of the work of others in her field per this criterion. This finding was not disturbed on the current motion.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO previously agreed that the Petitioner had served as a judge of the work of others in her field per this criterion. This finding was not disturbed on the current motion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-25_07_B2203; source_row=26245
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 艺术展示已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 艺术展示

display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases

证据为何得到认可

AAO previously found that the evidence established that the Petitioner met this criterion by submitting evidence of the display of her work at artistic exhibitions. This finding was not disturbed on the current motion.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO previously found that the evidence established that the Petitioner met this criterion by submitting evidence of the display of her work at artistic exhibitions. This finding was not disturbed on the current motion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-25_07_B2203; source_row=26246
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to consider this criterion because the Petitioner did not raise it in her motion to reopen before the Director or on appeal, and thus it was considered abandoned.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to consider this criterion because the Petitioner did not raise it in her motion to reopen before the Director or on appeal, and thus it was considered abandoned.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-25_07_B2203; source_row=26247
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他经理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO reserved the final merits determination as unnecessary because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the step-1 threshold, but noted in dicta that the record does not support a finding of sustained national or international acclaim.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved the final merits determination as unnecessary because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the step-1 threshold, but noted in dicta that the record does not support a finding of sustained national or international acclaim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-25_06_B2203; source_row=26241
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

化学 / 化学工程

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the Step 1 threshold of at least three criteria, though it noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not support the required acclaim.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the Step 1 threshold of at least three criteria, though it noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not support the required acclaim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-25_04_B2203; source_row=26226
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO reserved the formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial three-criteria threshold, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not support extraordinary ability.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved the formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial three-criteria threshold, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not support extraordinary ability.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-25_01_B2203; source_row=26208
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 高薪酬未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 高薪酬

High salary or other significantly high remuneration in relation to others in the field

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Beneficiary's duties (creating design frameworks, writing code, coordinating teams, developing photographic techniques) differ substantially from a film/video editor, making the payscale.com comparison improper. The proper comparison must be to others performing similar work at the top level of the field, not to workers in a related but distinct occupation.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Beneficiary's duties (creating design frameworks, writing code, coordinating teams, developing photographic techniques) differ substantially from a film/video editor, making the payscale.com comparison improper. The proper comparison must be to others performing similar work at the top level of the field, not to workers in a related but distinct occupation.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-25_03_B2203; source_row=26219
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

Final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the threshold of three criteria was not met, but observed in dicta that the record in the aggregate does not support the required acclaim.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the threshold of three criteria was not met, but observed in dicta that the record in the aggregate does not support the required acclaim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-25_03_B2203; source_row=26220
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 艺术展示申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 艺术展示

Display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases

裁决如何说明

Although the Petitioner referenced this criterion in its appeal brief, it offered no specific new arguments disputing the Director's decision, so AAO considered this issue abandoned.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Although the Petitioner referenced this criterion in its appeal brief, it offered no specific new arguments disputing the Director's decision, so AAO considered this issue abandoned.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-08-25_03_B2203; source_row=26217
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评