The new articles do not contain occupational wage data or salary survey results for orthopedic surgeons in Venezuela and do not cure the prior deficiencies in establishing the Petitioner's actual remuneration, which rested on incomplete, uncorroborated, and questionable numbers.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The new articles do not contain occupational wage data or salary survey results for orthopedic surgeons in Venezuela and do not cure the prior deficiencies in establishing the Petitioner's actual remuneration, which rested on incomplete, uncorroborated, and questionable numbers.
published material about the individual in professional or major trade publications or major media
证据为何得到认可
The AAO found that the Petitioner did not submit sufficient comparative circulation or distribution data for most sources, but found that the article published by Revista Ophelia in 2018 satisfies the criterion as a professional publication in the Petitioner's field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found that the Petitioner did not submit sufficient comparative circulation or distribution data for most sources, but found that the article published by Revista Ophelia in 2018 satisfies the criterion as a professional publication in the Petitioner's field.
The AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold of three evidentiary criteria, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not establish the required acclaim.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold of three evidentiary criteria, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not establish the required acclaim.
display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
证据为何得到认可
The AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner fulfilled the display criterion, noting that the record reflects his work has been exhibited at several gallery exhibitions.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner fulfilled the display criterion, noting that the record reflects his work has been exhibited at several gallery exhibitions.
leading or critical role for organizations with a distinguished reputation
证据为何得到认可
Both the Director and AAO found that the Petitioner serves in a leading or critical role with his current employer, and that the employer has a distinguished reputation in the banking industry.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Both the Director and AAO found that the Petitioner serves in a leading or critical role with his current employer, and that the employer has a distinguished reputation in the banking industry.
final merits determination – sustained national or international acclaim
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO concluded that the Petitioner's published articles, leadership role, salary, PRMIA membership, and reference letters, while showing recent accomplishments, did not collectively demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or that he is among the small percentage at the very top of the oil and gas banking field.…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concluded that the Petitioner's published articles, leadership role, salary, PRMIA membership, and reference letters, while showing recent accomplishments, did not collectively demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or that he is among the small percentage at the very top of the oil and gas banking field. Key achievements were all very recent (within one year of filing), and testimonial evidence was solicited and insufficiently corroborated.
high salary or other significantly high remuneration
证据为何得到认可
AAO found the Director erred by rejecting salary surveys for 'credit analyst' positions on the basis that they were not labeled 'Vice President' or 'Director' level, and by failing to acknowledge the portfolio manager salary data. AAO accepted the Petitioner's explanation that corporate titles did not reflect the nature of his work and that his earnings consistently exceeded comparators in his occupation.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director erred by rejecting salary surveys for 'credit analyst' positions on the basis that they were not labeled 'Vice President' or 'Director' level, and by failing to acknowledge the portfolio manager salary data. AAO accepted the Petitioner's explanation that corporate titles did not reflect the nature of his work and that his earnings consistently exceeded comparators in his occupation.
lesser nationally or internationally recognized awards or prizes
裁决如何说明
The Petitioner did not contest the Director's determination that he did not satisfy the lesser nationally or internationally recognized awards criterion on appeal.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not contest the Director's determination that he did not satisfy the lesser nationally or internationally recognized awards criterion on appeal.