可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 12801–12810

EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

裁决如何说明

AAO reserved this criterion because the Petitioner had already failed to meet three criteria, making further discussion unnecessary.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved this criterion because the Petitioner had already failed to meet three criteria, making further discussion unnecessary.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-07-29_03_B2203; source_row=26101
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

participation as a judge of the work of others

裁决如何说明

AAO treated this criterion as abandoned because the Petitioner did not contest the Director's conclusion on appeal.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO treated this criterion as abandoned because the Petitioner did not contest the Director's conclusion on appeal.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-07-29_03_B2203; source_row=26104
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role for distinguished organizations

裁决如何说明

AAO reserved this criterion as unnecessary because the Petitioner had already failed to meet at least three criteria.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved this criterion as unnecessary because the Petitioner had already failed to meet at least three criteria.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-07-29_03_B2203; source_row=26106
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO expressly declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed the Step 1 threshold, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record did not show the required acclaim.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO expressly declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed the Step 1 threshold, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record did not show the required acclaim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-07-29_01_B2203; source_row=26093
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

participation as a judge of the work of others

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner satisfied the judging criterion and it is the sole criterion she met.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner satisfied the judging criterion and it is the sole criterion she met.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-07-29_01_B2203; source_row=26089
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance in the field

AAO 为什么未被说服

The AAO had previously determined the two documentary films were not of major significance. On motion, the Petitioner re-quoted general praise letters without identifying specific contributions or showing major significance, and did not address or rebut the specific conclusions in the appellate decision.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO had previously determined the two documentary films were not of major significance. On motion, the Petitioner re-quoted general praise letters without identifying specific contributions or showing major significance, and did not address or rebut the specific conclusions in the appellate decision.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-07-28_02_B2203; source_row=26086
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media

AAO 为什么未被说服

The new media kit did not provide a basis for comparison with other U.S.-based news sites, and therefore did not establish the site as major media. The Petitioner's motion merely repeated the appellate brief and quoted materials whose content the AAO had not disputed, neither of which establishes error in the prior decision.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The new media kit did not provide a basis for comparison with other U.S.-based news sites, and therefore did not establish the site as major media. The Petitioner's motion merely repeated the appellate brief and quoted materials whose content the AAO had not disputed, neither of which establishes error in the prior decision.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-07-28_02_B2203; source_row=26084
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO had previously acknowledged international participation in the BIPA but found that participation does not establish recognition of the award. On motion, the Petitioner did not explain how that conclusion was in error. Claims about other awards had been abandoned on appeal and the Petitioner's assertion of involvement in an award-winning film was not the same as receipt of a prize.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO had previously acknowledged international participation in the BIPA but found that participation does not establish recognition of the award. On motion, the Petitioner did not explain how that conclusion was in error. Claims about other awards had been abandoned on appeal and the Petitioner's assertion of involvement in an award-winning film was not the same as receipt of a prize.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-07-28_02_B2203; source_row=26083
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

participation as a judge of the work of others

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner abandoned the moderator claim on appeal, and on motion provided no new information about those events and no basis for concluding the prior decision was in error. The separate judging claim the Petitioner raised on appeal was rejected because the Petitioner had not established the activity was in the same or allied field.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner abandoned the moderator claim on appeal, and on motion provided no new information about those events and no basis for concluding the prior decision was in error. The separate judging claim the Petitioner raised on appeal was rejected because the Petitioner had not established the activity was in the same or allied field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-07-28_02_B2203; source_row=26085
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 艺术展示已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 艺术展示

display at artistic exhibitions or showcases

证据为何得到认可

In the prior appellate decision, AAO determined that the Petitioner had satisfied criterion (vii) for display at artistic exhibitions or showcases, disagreeing with the Director's silence on this point.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
In the prior appellate decision, AAO determined that the Petitioner had satisfied criterion (vii) for display at artistic exhibitions or showcases, disagreeing with the Director's silence on this point.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-07-28_02_B2203; source_row=26087
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评