AAO found that the Director's conclusion was based on a factual error — the Petitioner did in fact address the criterion in the RFE response with clarifying and additional evidence. AAO remanded for a new determination considering all evidence.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Director's conclusion was based on a factual error — the Petitioner did in fact address the criterion in the RFE response with clarifying and additional evidence. AAO remanded for a new determination considering all evidence.
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
裁决如何说明
AAO found the Director's analysis of this criterion considered the initial evidence and the Petitioner's RFE response and provided a sufficient explanation; AAO did not disturb the Director's finding but the matter is remanded overall.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director's analysis of this criterion considered the initial evidence and the Petitioner's RFE response and provided a sufficient explanation; AAO did not disturb the Director's finding but the matter is remanded overall.
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
裁决如何说明
AAO found the Director's analysis of this criterion was sufficient and did not disturb the finding, noting it considered the initial evidence and RFE response.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director's analysis of this criterion was sufficient and did not disturb the finding, noting it considered the initial evidence and RFE response.
AAO found the Director's analysis was inadequate because it acknowledged only advertising campaigns in the RFE, did not refer to specific letters or categories of evidence in the denial, and failed to explain why the totality of evidence did not meet the criterion. AAO remanded for a new determination.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director's analysis was inadequate because it acknowledged only advertising campaigns in the RFE, did not refer to specific letters or categories of evidence in the denial, and failed to explain why the totality of evidence did not meet the criterion. AAO remanded for a new determination.
Same translation-certification issue as criterion (iii); AAO finds the certifications adequate and remands for proper evaluation including new evidence on appeal.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Same translation-certification issue as criterion (iii); AAO finds the certifications adequate and remands for proper evaluation including new evidence on appeal.
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
裁决如何说明
AAO observes that the Director failed to evaluate the awards evidence despite the Petitioner's claim under this criterion in both the initial filing and RFE response, and remands for evaluation.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO observes that the Director failed to evaluate the awards evidence despite the Petitioner's claim under this criterion in both the initial filing and RFE response, and remands for evaluation.
AAO finds the Director improperly limited his analysis to reference letters and overlooked the Petitioner's thirteen albums, live and televised performances, and social media evidence; remands for full review.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO finds the Director improperly limited his analysis to reference letters and overlooked the Petitioner's thirteen albums, live and televised performances, and social media evidence; remands for full review.
published material about the alien in professional or major media
裁决如何说明
AAO finds the Director erred in rejecting the translator certifications as non-compliant with 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(b)(3) and remands for evaluation of the translated documents along with new evidence submitted on appeal.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO finds the Director erred in rejecting the translator certifications as non-compliant with 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(b)(3) and remands for evaluation of the translated documents along with new evidence submitted on appeal.