AAO found that the Petitioner's participation in ranking abstracts for a conference satisfied the judging criterion, disagreeing with the Director who had not credited this activity.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Petitioner's participation in ranking abstracts for a conference satisfied the judging criterion, disagreeing with the Director who had not credited this activity.
AAO found the record as a whole insufficient to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or that the Beneficiary is among the small percentage at the very top of his field. His judging was internal to his employer, his publication record was limited, citation numbers were modest, recommendation letters were speculative about future impact, and his roles generated only local recognition.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the record as a whole insufficient to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or that the Beneficiary is among the small percentage at the very top of his field. His judging was internal to his employer, his publication record was limited, citation numbers were modest, recommendation letters were speculative about future impact, and his roles generated only local recognition.
AAO found that the Petitioner's judging experience involved only students and aspiring professionals, her publications attracted only two citations, her roles generated only local recognition, her media coverage consisted of articles quoting her as a spokesperson rather than covering her personally, her award was a municipal-level honor, and her recommendation letters speculated about future impact without establishing exis…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Petitioner's judging experience involved only students and aspiring professionals, her publications attracted only two citations, her roles generated only local recognition, her media coverage consisted of articles quoting her as a spokesperson rather than covering her personally, her award was a municipal-level honor, and her recommendation letters speculated about future impact without establishing existing national or international acclaim.
The Director and AAO both found this criterion met based on the Petitioner's participation on examination boards judging student term papers and evaluating teachers.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Director and AAO both found this criterion met based on the Petitioner's participation on examination boards judging student term papers and evaluating teachers.
ability to pay proffered wages for multiple I-140 petitions
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner submitted no information about the proffered wages for 31 identified petitions and no information at all about an additional 14 petitions, making it impossible to calculate combined ability to pay in any relevant year.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner submitted no information about the proffered wages for 31 identified petitions and no information at all about an additional 14 petitions, making it impossible to calculate combined ability to pay in any relevant year.