published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
AAO 为什么未被说服
The AAO declined to resolve whether the online publications constitute qualifying media, instead finding that the submitted materials are not about the Petitioner relating to his work in the field—they focused on the companies he co-founded and only incidentally quoted him.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO declined to resolve whether the online publications constitute qualifying media, instead finding that the submitted materials are not about the Petitioner relating to his work in the field—they focused on the companies he co-founded and only incidentally quoted him.
authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications or other major media
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found that the Petitioner conflated the publisher's reputation with whether individual books qualify as major trade publications, and the Petitioner cited no evidence on appeal to establish the books themselves are professional or major trade publications or other major media.
为什么值得参考
了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文，以及它在整体记录中说明什么。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Petitioner conflated the publisher's reputation with whether individual books qualify as major trade publications, and the Petitioner cited no evidence on appeal to establish the books themselves are professional or major trade publications or other major media.
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner was not named as a recipient of either platform award, and the record does not show either is nationally or internationally recognized. The archived USCIS guidance on venture capital was not shown to be binding or in effect when the petition was filed, and in any event the Petitioner did not show the specific venture capital source is nationally or internationally recognized.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner was not named as a recipient of either platform award, and the record does not show either is nationally or internationally recognized. The archived USCIS guidance on venture capital was not shown to be binding or in effect when the petition was filed, and in any event the Petitioner did not show the specific venture capital source is nationally or internationally recognized.
original contributions of major significance in the field
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO agreed with the Director that the record lacks preexisting, independent, and corroborating documentary evidence to support the assertions in the letters. Letters cannot substitute for documentary evidence regarding demonstrable facts like widespread implementation, and the patent citation record did not objectively show major significance.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the record lacks preexisting, independent, and corroborating documentary evidence to support the assertions in the letters. Letters cannot substitute for documentary evidence regarding demonstrable facts like widespread implementation, and the patent citation record did not objectively show major significance.
The AAO found that the evidence, primarily letters from employers and clients, demonstrated success on specific projects but not contributions of major significance to the field as a whole. Uncorroborated assertions and speculation about future impact could not establish the required field-wide influence.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found that the evidence, primarily letters from employers and clients, demonstrated success on specific projects but not contributions of major significance to the field as a whole. Uncorroborated assertions and speculation about future impact could not establish the required field-wide influence.
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
AAO 为什么未被说服
The AAO found that the evidence showed the Beneficiary led individual client projects but not that he performed in a leading or critical role for the organizations as a whole. The scale of financial impact (up to $18 million) was not significant relative to the organizations' revenues exceeding $40 billion annually.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found that the evidence showed the Beneficiary led individual client projects but not that he performed in a leading or critical role for the organizations as a whole. The scale of financial impact (up to $18 million) was not significant relative to the organizations' revenues exceeding $40 billion annually.
AAO conducted a de novo final merits review and found the totality of the evidence showed a developing career with increasing exposure but not yet the sustained acclaim or top-of-field status required.…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO conducted a de novo final merits review and found the totality of the evidence showed a developing career with increasing exposure but not yet the sustained acclaim or top-of-field status required. The Latin Grammy nomination was significant but not indicative of sustained acclaim; media coverage portrayed her as an emerging artist; streaming and chart data lacked comparative context; and the record label president's letter spoke only of future potential.
display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
AAO 为什么未被说服
The cooking competition was held at an industry trade conference, not an artistic exhibition or showcase. The event was part of conference programming in the food and beverage sector and did not qualify as an artistic exhibition or showcase for display of the chefs' work.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The cooking competition was held at an industry trade conference, not an artistic exhibition or showcase. The event was part of conference programming in the food and beverage sector and did not qualify as an artistic exhibition or showcase for display of the chefs' work.
high salary or other significantly high remuneration in relation to others in the field
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner was put on notice of the evidentiary deficiency via RFE and failed to submit comparative salary data in response. New comparative salary evidence submitted for the first time on appeal was not accepted under the Soriano/Obaigbena rule.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner was put on notice of the evidentiary deficiency via RFE and failed to submit comparative salary data in response. New comparative salary evidence submitted for the first time on appeal was not accepted under the Soriano/Obaigbena rule.
published material about the individual in professional or major trade publications or other major media
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner failed to submit evidence of the publications' circulation status when given the opportunity to do so via RFE. New evidence submitted for the first time on appeal was not accepted because the Petitioner had been put on notice of the deficiency and failed to address it. Additionally, the Cucina Italiana article could not be confirmed to be about the Petitioner based on employment records.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner failed to submit evidence of the publications' circulation status when given the opportunity to do so via RFE. New evidence submitted for the first time on appeal was not accepted because the Petitioner had been put on notice of the deficiency and failed to address it. Additionally, the Cucina Italiana article could not be confirmed to be about the Petitioner based on employment records.