可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 13221–13230

EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation

证据为何得到认可

The record adequately supports the Director's determination and contains sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the Petitioner enjoys a distinguished reputation in its niche industry of architectural metalworking.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The record adequately supports the Director's determination and contains sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the Petitioner enjoys a distinguished reputation in its niche industry of architectural metalworking.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_19_B2203; source_row=25633
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 艺术展示已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 艺术展示

display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases

证据为何得到认可

The record demonstrates the Beneficiary has displayed his work at national blacksmith exhibitions and other events qualifying as artistic exhibitions or showcases.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The record demonstrates the Beneficiary has displayed his work at national blacksmith exhibitions and other events qualifying as artistic exhibitions or showcases.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_19_B2203; source_row=25632
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination – sustained national or international acclaim

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Beneficiary's early career activities did not reflect national or international acclaim; there is a significant gap in the record from the mid-2000s to 2015; the acclaim for his most notable award-winning work accrued to his employer; and the expert letters recited statutory language without sufficient explanation or corroboration.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Beneficiary's early career activities did not reflect national or international acclaim; there is a significant gap in the record from the mid-2000s to 2015; the acclaim for his most notable award-winning work accrued to his employer; and the expert letters recited statutory language without sufficient explanation or corroboration.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_19_B2203; source_row=25635
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

物理医生

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

The Director found this criterion satisfied based on the Petitioner's co-authored articles in peer-reviewed journals, and AAO did not disturb that finding.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Director found this criterion satisfied based on the Petitioner's co-authored articles in peer-reviewed journals, and AAO did not disturb that finding.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_20_B2203; source_row=25637
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

物理医生

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to formally conduct the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidentiary threshold, though it noted in the alternative that the record would not support a finding of sustained acclaim.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to formally conduct the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidentiary threshold, though it noted in the alternative that the record would not support a finding of sustained acclaim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_20_B2203; source_row=25639
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床大学教师

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO agreed that the record does not establish sustained national or international acclaim. The editorial board memberships largely reflect connections to a single open-source publisher and do not independently demonstrate acclaim. Published work and conference presentations are integral elements of scientific research, not elite privileges, and the Petitioner's citation metrics do not show she is at the very top of her field.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the record does not establish sustained national or international acclaim. The editorial board memberships largely reflect connections to a single open-source publisher and do not independently demonstrate acclaim. Published work and conference presentations are integral elements of scientific research, not elite privileges, and the Petitioner's citation metrics do not show she is at the very top of her field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_13_B2203; source_row=25601
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床大学教师

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

authorship of scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner satisfies this criterion through the publication of several scholarly articles.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner satisfies this criterion through the publication of several scholarly articles.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_13_B2203; source_row=25599
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

authorship of scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

AAO accepted the Director's determination that the Petitioner satisfied this criterion based on his two authored books.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO accepted the Director's determination that the Petitioner satisfied this criterion based on his two authored books.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_01_B2203; source_row=25531
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

生物医学 / 生命科学16 次引用

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

authorship of scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed that the petitioner's record of scholarly articles satisfies criterion (vi).

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the petitioner's record of scholarly articles satisfies criterion (vi).
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_04_B2203; source_row=25549
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

生物医学 / 生命科学16 次引用

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

participation as a judge of the work of others

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed that the petitioner's peer review activity satisfies criterion (iv).

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the petitioner's peer review activity satisfies criterion (iv).
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_04_B2203; source_row=25547
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评