可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 13241–13250

EB-1AEB-1A · 商业成功申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 商业成功

commercial success in the performing arts

裁决如何说明

Petitioner abandoned the criterion (x) claim on appeal after the Director found insufficient documentary evidence.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Petitioner abandoned the criterion (x) claim on appeal after the Director found insufficient documentary evidence.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_06_B2203; source_row=25565
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO did not reverse the Director on criterion (ii); only criteria (iii), (iv), and (vii) were found met.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not reverse the Director on criterion (ii); only criteria (iii), (iv), and (vii) were found met.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_06_B2203; source_row=25560
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with distinguished reputation

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner met criterion viii based on his role as executive chef and documentation of the restaurant's distinguished reputation.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner met criterion viii based on his role as executive chef and documentation of the restaurant's distinguished reputation.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_18_B2203; source_row=25624
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidence threshold of three criteria, but noted in dicta that the record does not show the required acclaim.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidence threshold of three criteria, but noted in dicta that the record does not show the required acclaim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_18_B2203; source_row=25627
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能工程师

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to revisit this criterion because even accepting the Director's favorable finding, the Petitioner still could not meet the three-criterion threshold once the leading/critical role criterion was found not met.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to revisit this criterion because even accepting the Director's favorable finding, the Petitioner still could not meet the three-criterion threshold once the leading/critical role criterion was found not met.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_10_B2203; source_row=25581
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 高薪酬保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能工程师

审查的问题

EB-1A · 高薪酬

high remuneration for services

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to revisit this criterion because even accepting the Director's favorable finding, the Petitioner still could not meet the three-criterion threshold.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to revisit this criterion because even accepting the Director's favorable finding, the Petitioner still could not meet the three-criterion threshold.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_10_B2203; source_row=25583
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed that the Petitioner's service as a judge at regional dance competitions satisfies the plain wording of the regulation, noting that scope and reputation of those competitions would be relevant at the final merits stage.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner's service as a judge at regional dance competitions satisfies the plain wording of the regulation, noting that scope and reputation of those competitions would be relevant at the final merits stage.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_16_B2203; source_row=25612
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO formally reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner did not clear the step-one threshold, but provided an advisory observation that the record would not support the required showing of sustained national or international acclaim.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO formally reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner did not clear the step-one threshold, but provided an advisory observation that the record would not support the required showing of sustained national or international acclaim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_16_B2203; source_row=25615
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 艺术展示已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 艺术展示

artistic exhibitions or showcases

证据为何得到认可

AAO disagreed with the Director's conflation of criteria (vii) and (x), finding that criterion (x) covers commercial success rather than mere participation, so performance-as-display under criterion (vii) does not make the two criteria indistinguishable. AAO found that the Petitioner's co-choreographed work was selected by an externally curated event with competitive entrance requirements, satisfying this criterion.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO disagreed with the Director's conflation of criteria (vii) and (x), finding that criterion (x) covers commercial success rather than mere participation, so performance-as-display under criterion (vii) does not make the two criteria indistinguishable. AAO found that the Petitioner's co-choreographed work was selected by an externally curated event with competitive entrance requirements, satisfying this criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_16_B2203; source_row=25613
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

环境 / 能源6 篇论文

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published material about the individual

裁决如何说明

The Petitioner initially claimed criterion (iii) but did not pursue it on appeal, so AAO deemed it waived.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner initially claimed criterion (iii) but did not pursue it on appeal, so AAO deemed it waived.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_09_B2203; source_row=25576
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评