可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 13251–13260

EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

环境 / 能源6 篇论文

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

authorship of scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

The record reflects that the Petitioner has authored scholarly articles published by scientific journals including Journal of Arid Environments, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, GIScience & Remote Sensing, and Rangeland Ecology and Management.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The record reflects that the Petitioner has authored scholarly articles published by scientific journals including Journal of Arid Environments, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, GIScience & Remote Sensing, and Rangeland Ecology and Management.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_09_B2203; source_row=25579
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

环境 / 能源6 篇论文

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging the work of others

证据为何得到认可

The Petitioner met the judging criterion by providing evidence that he has peer reviewed manuscripts for several professional publications.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner met the judging criterion by providing evidence that he has peer reviewed manuscripts for several professional publications.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_09_B2203; source_row=25577
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

环境 / 能源6 篇论文

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the minimum three criteria at Step 1, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not support the required acclaim.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the minimum three criteria at Step 1, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not support the required acclaim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_09_B2203; source_row=25580
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 艺术展示已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 艺术展示

display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases

证据为何得到认可

AAO disagreed with the Director's limitation of this criterion to visual artists, finding the regulation requires only that the work displayed be the petitioner's own and that the venues be artistic exhibitions or showcases. The Petitioner's performances at music festivals and Colombian arts and cultural events satisfy the plain language of this criterion.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO disagreed with the Director's limitation of this criterion to visual artists, finding the regulation requires only that the work displayed be the petitioner's own and that the venues be artistic exhibitions or showcases. The Petitioner's performances at music festivals and Colombian arts and cultural events satisfy the plain language of this criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_17_B2203; source_row=25617
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation

证据为何得到认可

AAO confirmed the Petitioner served in a critical role as lead guitarist and co-writer, and that the group had a distinguished reputation evidenced by a Latin Grammy nomination, significant media coverage, and national and international touring.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO confirmed the Petitioner served in a critical role as lead guitarist and co-writer, and that the group had a distinguished reputation evidenced by a Latin Grammy nomination, significant media coverage, and national and international touring.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_17_B2203; source_row=25618
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO explicitly declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidentiary threshold, while noting in advisory dictum that the aggregate record would not support a finding of extraordinary ability.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidentiary threshold, while noting in advisory dictum that the aggregate record would not support a finding of extraordinary ability.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_17_B2203; source_row=25620
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found that the Petitioner's provincial-level recognition, a single award naming 25 recipients, articles without demonstrated impact, and unemployment since 2015 failed to establish sustained national or international acclaim. Partial disavowal of evidence by current counsel further undermined confidence in the record.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Petitioner's provincial-level recognition, a single award naming 25 recipients, articles without demonstrated impact, and unemployment since 2015 failed to establish sustained national or international acclaim. Partial disavowal of evidence by current counsel further undermined confidence in the record.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_12_B2203; source_row=25595
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role for distinguished organizations or establishments

证据为何得到认可

AAO found that the company has a distinguished reputation as a major company in its field and that the Petitioner performed in a leading or critical role as a member of its board of directors.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the company has a distinguished reputation as a major company in its field and that the Petitioner performed in a leading or critical role as a member of its board of directors.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_12_B2203; source_row=25593
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能20 篇论文

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievement

裁决如何说明

The Petitioner did not contest the Director's finding on this criterion on appeal, so the AAO deemed the issue waived.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not contest the Director's finding on this criterion on appeal, so the AAO deemed the issue waived.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_15_B2203; source_row=25609
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能20 篇论文

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold of three qualifying criteria, but noted in dicta that the record does not support the required acclaim.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold of three qualifying criteria, but noted in dicta that the record does not support the required acclaim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_15_B2203; source_row=25610
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评