可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 13261–13270

EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能20 篇论文

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

authorship of scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed that the Petitioner's scholarly articles, including journal articles and more than 20 conference papers, satisfy this criterion.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner's scholarly articles, including journal articles and more than 20 conference papers, satisfy this criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_15_B2203; source_row=25608
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能20 篇论文

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed that the Petitioner's peer reviewing of manuscripts for conferences and professional journals satisfies this criterion.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner's peer reviewing of manuscripts for conferences and professional journals satisfies this criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_15_B2203; source_row=25606
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

化学 / 化学工程研究员62 篇论文

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

participation as a judge of the work of others

证据为何得到认可

AAO confirmed the Petitioner met this criterion, noting his peer review of manuscripts for several journals including Optical Materials and Optics Letters.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO confirmed the Petitioner met this criterion, noting his peer review of manuscripts for several journals including Optical Materials and Optics Letters.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_03_B2203; source_row=25541
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

化学 / 化学工程研究员62 篇论文

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed the initial evidentiary threshold, but noted in the alternative that the record does not establish sustained acclaim.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed the initial evidentiary threshold, but noted in the alternative that the record does not establish sustained acclaim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_03_B2203; source_row=25545
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

化学 / 化学工程研究员62 篇论文

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

authorship of scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

AAO confirmed the Petitioner met this criterion based on co-authored scholarly articles published in multiple professional publications.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO confirmed the Petitioner met this criterion based on co-authored scholarly articles published in multiple professional publications.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_03_B2203; source_row=25543
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

生物医学 / 生命科学医生

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner fulfilled the judging criterion based on peer review activity and editorial board membership.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner fulfilled the judging criterion based on peer review activity and editorial board membership.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_14_B2203; source_row=25602
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

生物医学 / 生命科学医生

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

authorship of scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner fulfilled the scholarly articles criterion based on his publications in peer-reviewed scientific journals.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner fulfilled the scholarly articles criterion based on his publications in peer-reviewed scientific journals.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_14_B2203; source_row=25604
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

生物医学 / 生命科学医生

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to conduct a final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold requirement of at least three evidentiary criteria, but noted in dicta that the record does not support a finding of sustained acclaim.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to conduct a final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the threshold requirement of at least three evidentiary criteria, but noted in dicta that the record does not support a finding of sustained acclaim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_14_B2203; source_row=25605
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

Final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the initial evidence threshold, though it noted in passing that the aggregate record did not support the required level of acclaim.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the initial evidence threshold, though it noted in passing that the aggregate record did not support the required level of acclaim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_02_B2203; source_row=25539
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

Judging the work of others

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed the criterion was met. The Petitioner served as a judge at multiple advertising competitions, including the Cyber Category of one program, the Creation Awards, and a festival sponsored by an association of advertising professionals.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the criterion was met. The Petitioner served as a judge at multiple advertising competitions, including the Cyber Category of one program, the Creation Awards, and a festival sponsored by an association of advertising professionals.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-23_02_B2203; source_row=25536
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评