可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 13291–13300

EB-1AEB-1A · 评审未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging the work of others

AAO 为什么未被说服

The new certificates submitted on appeal were unsupported by independent documentary evidence and were internally inconsistent with previously submitted materials — specifically, the names of award recipients differed between the certificates and a social media article describing the same ceremony. The Petitioner did not resolve these discrepancies with objective evidence.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The new certificates submitted on appeal were unsupported by independent documentary evidence and were internally inconsistent with previously submitted materials — specifically, the names of award recipients differed between the certificates and a social media article describing the same ceremony. The Petitioner did not resolve these discrepancies with objective evidence.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-06_02_B2203; source_row=25511
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

foreign equivalent degree to U.S. baccalaureate

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO agreed that the ICAI is a professional association, not a college or university, and that its membership certificate is not a degree. Educational comparability to a U.S. bachelor's degree does not transform the ICAI credential into a foreign equivalent degree. The academic equivalency evaluations relied improperly on the ICAI certificate as a degree.…

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the ICAI is a professional association, not a college or university, and that its membership certificate is not a degree. Educational comparability to a U.S. bachelor's degree does not transform the ICAI credential into a foreign equivalent degree. The academic equivalency evaluations relied improperly on the ICAI certificate as a degree. Prior non-precedent AAO decisions to the contrary are not binding and that finding was also dicta.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-03_01_B5203; source_row=25499
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

other

minimum educational requirement of the labor certification

AAO 为什么未被说服

For the same reasons the ICAI membership does not constitute a foreign equivalent degree under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(i)(B), the Beneficiary does not satisfy the labor certification's minimum educational requirement of a bachelor's degree or foreign educational equivalent.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
For the same reasons the ICAI membership does not constitute a foreign equivalent degree under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(i)(B), the Beneficiary does not satisfy the labor certification's minimum educational requirement of a bachelor's degree or foreign educational equivalent.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-03_01_B5203; source_row=25500
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估未满足

案件事实

金融

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found that the Petitioner's sporadic auditing and editing activities, limited and sparsely cited publication record, modest downloads, and reference letters lacking specific detail about field-wide impact collectively fell short of demonstrating sustained national or international acclaim and placement among the small percentage at the very top of the field.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Petitioner's sporadic auditing and editing activities, limited and sparsely cited publication record, modest downloads, and reference letters lacking specific detail about field-wide impact collectively fell short of demonstrating sustained national or international acclaim and placement among the small percentage at the very top of the field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-01_01_B2203; source_row=25496
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

金融

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

The Petitioner authored articles in professional publications and contributed chapters to books, satisfying the scholarly articles criterion.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner authored articles in professional publications and contributed chapters to books, satisfying the scholarly articles criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-01_01_B2203; source_row=25494
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

金融

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role

证据为何得到认可

The Petitioner performed in a leading or critical role as founder, chairman, president, chief accountant, and legal representative of his company.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner performed in a leading or critical role as founder, chairman, president, chief accountant, and legal representative of his company.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-01_01_B2203; source_row=25495
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

金融

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

证据为何得到认可

The record reflects that the Petitioner served as a judge of the work of others, including participation in audits and serving as an editor for books.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The record reflects that the Petitioner served as a judge of the work of others, including participation in audits and serving as an editor for books.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-01_01_B2203; source_row=25493
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

金融

审查的问题

other

ability to pay proffered wage from priority date

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner provided ability-to-pay evidence only for 2017, but the priority date was September 7, 2018. No evidence for 2018 was in the record, so AAO could not find the Petitioner had the required continuing ability to pay.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner provided ability-to-pay evidence only for 2017, but the priority date was September 7, 2018. No evidence for 2018 was in the record, so AAO could not find the Petitioner had the required continuing ability to pay.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-01_01_B5203; source_row=25498
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWother未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

金融

审查的问题

other

24 months of qualifying experience by priority date

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO agreed that the omission of qualifying experience from the labor certification undermines the credibility of that experience, and that no independent objective evidence was presented to rehabilitate it. The only confirmed experience (Universidad) covered less than 24 months, and the Petitioner disclaimed reliance on its own employment of the Beneficiary.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the omission of qualifying experience from the labor certification undermines the credibility of that experience, and that no independent objective evidence was presented to rehabilitate it. The only confirmed experience (Universidad) covered less than 24 months, and the Petitioner disclaimed reliance on its own employment of the Beneficiary.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-04-01_01_B5203; source_row=25497
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道未满足

案件事实

物理2,013 篇论文

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published material about the individual

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO agreed with the Director that journal articles citing the Beneficiary's research among dozens of other citations do not qualify as published material about the Beneficiary. AAO also noted the Petitioner misquoted the applicable regulation, citing the outstanding professor/researcher standard rather than the extraordinary ability standard.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that journal articles citing the Beneficiary's research among dozens of other citations do not qualify as published material about the Beneficiary. AAO also noted the Petitioner misquoted the applicable regulation, citing the outstanding professor/researcher standard rather than the extraordinary ability standard.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-03-31_01_B2203; source_row=25488
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评