AAO explicitly declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the initial evidence threshold of three criteria, though AAO noted in an advisory comment that the aggregate record would not support a finding of sustained national or international acclaim.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner did not meet the initial evidence threshold of three criteria, though AAO noted in an advisory comment that the aggregate record would not support a finding of sustained national or international acclaim.
AAO found that the Petitioner effectively abandoned this issue on appeal by maintaining the claim without elaboration, and declined to further address it.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Petitioner effectively abandoned this issue on appeal by maintaining the claim without elaboration, and declined to further address it.
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found that the submitted materials do not satisfy the standard because they mention the Petitioner only briefly or identify him without pertaining to his work. AAO also noted the Petitioner misquoted Muni v. INS, and the case does not support the proposition advanced.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the submitted materials do not satisfy the standard because they mention the Petitioner only briefly or identify him without pertaining to his work. AAO also noted the Petitioner misquoted Muni v. INS, and the case does not support the proposition advanced.
Publication on a university institutional repository with no apparent selection process does not amount to publication in a professional journal or other major media.
为什么值得参考
了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文，以及它在整体记录中说明什么。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Publication on a university institutional repository with no apparent selection process does not amount to publication in a professional journal or other major media.
The Petitioner's salary is well below the prevailing wage for music directors and composers, and clergy wages are not an appropriate comparison for his field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner's salary is well below the prevailing wage for music directors and composers, and clergy wages are not an appropriate comparison for his field.
The letters praise the Petitioner's skills but do not show his contributions have widely influenced the field or otherwise risen to major significance.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The letters praise the Petitioner's skills but do not show his contributions have widely influenced the field or otherwise risen to major significance.
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
AAO 为什么未被说服
Although the Petitioner documented receipt of the award, the supporting evidence is insufficient to show it is a nationally or internationally recognized prize or award for excellence in the field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Although the Petitioner documented receipt of the award, the supporting evidence is insufficient to show it is a nationally or internationally recognized prize or award for excellence in the field.
leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation
AAO 为什么未被说服
The letters do not describe in sufficient detail how the Petitioner's role was leading or critical, and a program or class is not an 'organization or establishment.'
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The letters do not describe in sufficient detail how the Petitioner's role was leading or critical, and a program or class is not an 'organization or establishment.'