可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 13341–13350

EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道未满足

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media

AAO 为什么未被说服

Court decisions and articles about cases are not about the Petitioner himself; the consulting firm articles do not mention the Petitioner; and the Times of India article and YouTube video, while naming the Petitioner, are about the legal issue rather than about him and his work.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Court decisions and articles about cases are not about the Petitioner himself; the consulting firm articles do not mention the Petitioner; and the Times of India article and YouTube video, while naming the Petitioner, are about the legal issue rather than about him and his work.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-03-19_02_B2203; source_row=25442
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员未满足

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

AAO 为什么未被说服

The reference letters did not establish that the selection process for senior standing counsel required outstanding achievements as opposed to a certain set of skills and experience in tax litigation, and the Petitioner did not explain why this employment should be considered comparable to association membership.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The reference letters did not establish that the selection process for senior standing counsel required outstanding achievements as opposed to a certain set of skills and experience in tax litigation, and the Petitioner did not explain why this employment should be considered comparable to association membership.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-03-19_02_B2203; source_row=25441
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献未满足

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance in the field

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner's claimed list of citing cases actually showed only results of a name search and did not demonstrate future impact; more fundamentally, defending an already-established legal position does not demonstrate originality, and the evidence did not establish that his advocacy role constituted original contributions to international tax law.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner's claimed list of citing cases actually showed only results of a name search and did not demonstrate future impact; more fundamentally, defending an already-established legal position does not demonstrate originality, and the evidence did not establish that his advocacy role constituted original contributions to international tax law.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-03-19_02_B2203; source_row=25444
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者未满足

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications or other major media

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner failed to establish that his law firm's website qualifies as a professional or major trade publication or other major medium, and did not specifically address this issue in his RFE responses or on appeal.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner failed to establish that his law firm's website qualifies as a professional or major trade publication or other major medium, and did not specifically address this issue in his RFE responses or on appeal.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-03-19_02_B2203; source_row=25445
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's peer review work for the symposium satisfied this criterion.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's peer review work for the symposium satisfied this criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-03-19_03_B2203; source_row=25447
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

AAO disagreed with the Director, finding that the poster published in the World Congress proceedings constitutes a scholarly article published in a professional medium, satisfying the plain language of this criterion.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO disagreed with the Director, finding that the poster published in the World Congress proceedings constitutes a scholarly article published in a professional medium, satisfying the plain language of this criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-03-19_03_B2203; source_row=25448
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO agreed with the Director that the criterion was not met. While the Petitioner led a team and contributed to product development at a distinguished employer, the evidence did not show he acted as a leader for the overall organization of 22,000+ employees, nor that his contribution was critical to the organization's overall success or activities.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the criterion was not met. While the Petitioner led a team and contributed to product development at a distinguished employer, the evidence did not show he acted as a leader for the overall organization of 22,000+ employees, nor that his contribution was critical to the organization's overall success or activities.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-03-19_03_B2203; source_row=25449
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role for organizations with a distinguished reputation

证据为何得到认可

The reference letters sufficiently established that the Petitioner played a critical role for his employer in implementing the application and integrating it with other systems, and the record sufficiently demonstrated that the employer enjoys a distinguished reputation.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The reference letters sufficiently established that the Petitioner played a critical role for his employer in implementing the application and integrating it with other systems, and the record sufficiently demonstrated that the employer enjoys a distinguished reputation.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-03-19_01_B2203; source_row=25438
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the threshold of at least three criteria, but noted in dicta that the record does not support the required showing of sustained acclaim.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the threshold of at least three criteria, but noted in dicta that the record does not support the required showing of sustained acclaim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-03-19_01_B2203; source_row=25440
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner did not establish that minimum experiential qualifications and payment of dues are achievements demonstrating a candidate stands out from peers, that exam completion constitutes an outstanding achievement, or that candidates are judged by recognized national or international experts.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not establish that minimum experiential qualifications and payment of dues are achievements demonstrating a candidate stands out from peers, that exam completion constitutes an outstanding achievement, or that candidates are judged by recognized national or international experts.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2020-03-19_01_B2203; source_row=25435
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评