lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
AAO 为什么未被说服
For the screenwriting award, the record did not establish national or international recognition commensurate with this criterion; the Baike encyclopedia entry was given no evidentiary weight, the expert letter lacked corroboration, and the two brief articles were insufficient to demonstrate the requisite level of media coverage.…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
For the screenwriting award, the record did not establish national or international recognition commensurate with this criterion; the Baike encyclopedia entry was given no evidentiary weight, the expert letter lacked corroboration, and the two brief articles were insufficient to demonstrate the requisite level of media coverage. For the Excellent Feature Film award, the award was given to the film and its investors/production companies, not to the Petitioner personally, so it fails the plain language of the regulation.
AAO did not adopt the Director's rationale that a screenwriter/director is categorically excluded, but found the criterion was not met because the record lacked corroborating evidence of the box office receipts and evidence of the film's commercial success relative to others in the industry.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not adopt the Director's rationale that a screenwriter/director is categorically excluded, but found the criterion was not met because the record lacked corroborating evidence of the box office receipts and evidence of the film's commercial success relative to others in the industry.
AAO disagreed with the Director's peer-based rationale, finding that judging written works regardless of intended audience would be within the Petitioner's field. However, AAO found insufficient evidence that the Petitioner actually participated as a judge due to an unexplained inconsistency between her appointment dates and a co-judge's statement about when she served.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO disagreed with the Director's peer-based rationale, finding that judging written works regardless of intended audience would be within the Petitioner's field. However, AAO found insufficient evidence that the Petitioner actually participated as a judge due to an unexplained inconsistency between her appointment dates and a co-judge's statement about when she served.
published material about the individual in professional or major trade publications or other major media
AAO 为什么未被说服
Articles from major English-language outlets were reviews of the film rather than articles about the Petitioner. Chinese-language articles that were about the Petitioner were not accompanied by sufficient evidence establishing the publications as major media; Wikipedia and Baidu entries were given no evidentiary weight, and circulation figures without comparative data were insufficient.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Articles from major English-language outlets were reviews of the film rather than articles about the Petitioner. Chinese-language articles that were about the Petitioner were not accompanied by sufficient evidence establishing the publications as major media; Wikipedia and Baidu entries were given no evidentiary weight, and circulation figures without comparative data were insufficient.
Original contributions of major significance in the field
AAO 为什么未被说服
The letters praised the Petitioner's abilities but did not identify original contributions or explain how those contributions had major significance outside his employer and former university. The new evidence of volunteer art mentoring did not establish an original contribution to the field or that two days of volunteer service remarkably influenced the field.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The letters praised the Petitioner's abilities but did not identify original contributions or explain how those contributions had major significance outside his employer and former university. The new evidence of volunteer art mentoring did not establish an original contribution to the field or that two days of volunteer service remarkably influenced the field.
Display of the individual's work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
AAO 为什么未被说服
YouTube upload of a music video does not qualify as an artistic exhibition or showcase; the trade show booths were not artistic exhibitions and occurred after the petition filing; and the Petitioner did not provide specific evidence of his artwork displayed at identified artistic exhibitions or showcases.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
YouTube upload of a music video does not qualify as an artistic exhibition or showcase; the trade show booths were not artistic exhibitions and occurred after the petition filing; and the Petitioner did not provide specific evidence of his artwork displayed at identified artistic exhibitions or showcases.
The evidence did not include box office receipts or sales of recorded media attributable to the Petitioner's own work in the performing arts, as the regulation requires. Photos with voice actors at Comic Con do not satisfy this criterion.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The evidence did not include box office receipts or sales of recorded media attributable to the Petitioner's own work in the performing arts, as the regulation requires. Photos with voice actors at Comic Con do not satisfy this criterion.
Published material about the individual in professional or major trade publications or other major media
AAO 为什么未被说服
The newspaper article was about the contest and its winners as a whole, not about the Petitioner and his work. The article also failed to identify the newspaper title, date of publication, or author, and was not shown to qualify as a professional/major trade publication or major media. The Petitioner waived the music video claim on appeal.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The newspaper article was about the contest and its winners as a whole, not about the Petitioner and his work. The article also failed to identify the newspaper title, date of publication, or author, and was not shown to qualify as a professional/major trade publication or major media. The Petitioner waived the music video claim on appeal.
Membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
AAO 为什么未被说服
Completing a training course is not membership; the freelance company's selection process appeared to be standard hiring rather than an association membership; the 3D Mentors Group lacked supporting evidence of its criteria; and a Facebook group for online course students does not qualify as an association requiring outstanding achievements.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Completing a training course is not membership; the freelance company's selection process appeared to be standard hiring rather than an association membership; the 3D Mentors Group lacked supporting evidence of its criteria; and a Facebook group for online course students does not qualify as an association requiring outstanding achievements.
Leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation
AAO 为什么未被说服
The letters confirmed employment and praised the Petitioner's skills but were too general and lacked specific information about how his roles were leading or critical to the organizations. The Autodesk claim was unsupported by any letter, certificate, or resume reference confirming a trainer role.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The letters confirmed employment and praised the Petitioner's skills but were too general and lacked specific information about how his roles were leading or critical to the organizations. The Autodesk claim was unsupported by any letter, certificate, or resume reference confirming a trainer role.