High salary or other remuneration relative to others in the field
证据为何得到认可
The Petitioner provided probative evidence of his 2015 year-end earnings along with evidence from two reliable sources demonstrating that he commanded a high salary relative to others working in the same occupation in his geographic region.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner provided probative evidence of his 2015 year-end earnings along with evidence from two reliable sources demonstrating that he commanded a high salary relative to others working in the same occupation in his geographic region.
AAO agreed that the Petitioner demonstrated he was asked to participate as a judge in the college thesis evaluation for the animation department's graduating class of 2015.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner demonstrated he was asked to participate as a judge in the college thesis evaluation for the animation department's graduating class of 2015.
Date Beneficiary's post-baccalaureate experience began
裁决如何说明
AAO does not resolve whether the Beneficiary's post-baccalaureate period began in June 2008 or upon diploma issuance in February 2009; instead, it remands for the Director to consider whether O-A-'s provisional-certificate rule applies.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO does not resolve whether the Beneficiary's post-baccalaureate period began in June 2008 or upon diploma issuance in February 2009; instead, it remands for the Director to consider whether O-A-'s provisional-certificate rule applies.
The January 2016 financial-officer statement is inadequate, and the only annual report submitted covers 2014; no evidence demonstrates ability to pay in subsequent years, and the Petitioner has filed multiple I-140s for other beneficiaries requiring proof of ability to pay combined proffered wages.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The January 2016 financial-officer statement is inadequate, and the only annual report submitted covers 2014; no evidence demonstrates ability to pay in subsequent years, and the Petitioner has filed multiple I-140s for other beneficiaries requiring proof of ability to pay combined proffered wages.
Documentation of five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience
AAO 为什么未被说服
Letters from the two prior Indian employers fail to describe the Beneficiary's experience as required by regulation; coworker affidavits are insufficient because the Petitioner did not show the unavailability of compliant employer letters or corroborate the coworkers' employment, and inconsistencies regarding the Beneficiary's role at one employer remain unresolved.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Letters from the two prior Indian employers fail to describe the Beneficiary's experience as required by regulation; coworker affidavits are insufficient because the Petitioner did not show the unavailability of compliant employer letters or corroborate the coworkers' employment, and inconsistencies regarding the Beneficiary's role at one employer remain unresolved.
leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found that while the Petitioner is one of nearly 100 valued performers, the reference letter did not establish a leading or critical role, lacking specific information on the impact of his performance, increased revenues, or that his role ranked above other performers.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that while the Petitioner is one of nearly 100 valued performers, the reference letter did not establish a leading or critical role, lacking specific information on the impact of his performance, increased revenues, or that his role ranked above other performers.
high salary or other significantly high remuneration
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found that the Petitioner's $60,000 annual salary did not establish a high salary in relation to others in the field, as the salary data showed the most experienced workers could earn up to $58,500 and the top 10% earned at least $85,660, making the Petitioner's salary not comparably high.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Petitioner's $60,000 annual salary did not establish a high salary in relation to others in the field, as the salary data showed the most experienced workers could earn up to $58,500 and the top 10% earned at least $85,660, making the Petitioner's salary not comparably high.