five years of qualifying experience in job offered or alternate occupations
AAO 为什么未被说服
The employer documents do not describe the Beneficiary's duties or proficiencies as required by 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1); the co-worker affidavit is unreliable and copies the labor cert duties verbatim; and inconsistent job titles and the absence of HTML proficiency further undermine the claim.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The employer documents do not describe the Beneficiary's duties or proficiencies as required by 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1); the co-worker affidavit is unreliable and copies the labor cert duties verbatim; and inconsistent job titles and the absence of HTML proficiency further undermine the claim.
bachelor's degree in field of study required by labor certification
AAO 为什么未被说服
The new evaluation does not detail coursework or compare it to a U.S. computer science curriculum, and does not reconcile its conclusion with the prior evaluation that equated the degree to Information Technology.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The new evaluation does not detail coursework or compare it to a U.S. computer science curriculum, and does not reconcile its conclusion with the prior evaluation that equated the degree to Information Technology.
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found the article was about the Petitioner's research, not about the Petitioner himself (he is listed only as a contact), and that the Petitioner failed to establish Simulia Community News or the company website qualifies as a professional or major trade publication or other major medium.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the article was about the Petitioner's research, not about the Petitioner himself (he is listed only as a contact), and that the Petitioner failed to establish Simulia Community News or the company website qualifies as a professional or major trade publication or other major medium.
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found the IACSIT membership argument untimely (submitted letter dated December 2018, after February 2018 filing date) and substantively insufficient because IACSIT senior membership is based solely on holding a doctoral degree, not on outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the IACSIT membership argument untimely (submitted letter dated December 2018, after February 2018 filing date) and substantively insufficient because IACSIT senior membership is based solely on holding a doctoral degree, not on outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts.
AAO withdrew the Director's finding, concluding that the email submitted was only a reminder to complete reviews, not proof that the Petitioner actually completed paper reviews. No corroborating evidence showed how many or which papers the Petitioner reviewed.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding, concluding that the email submitted was only a reminder to complete reviews, not proof that the Petitioner actually completed paper reviews. No corroborating evidence showed how many or which papers the Petitioner reviewed.
Letters were conclusory and lacked corroborating evidence of the claimed revenue impacts or other outcomes; no evidence established that any of the organizations enjoy a distinguished reputation; and examples showed importance to the employer's team rather than significant importance to the outcome of the establishment's activities overall.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Letters were conclusory and lacked corroborating evidence of the claimed revenue impacts or other outcomes; no evidence established that any of the organizations enjoy a distinguished reputation; and examples showed importance to the employer's team rather than significant importance to the outcome of the establishment's activities overall.
Most articles were about the Beneficiary's employers rather than about the Beneficiary himself. Articles that were about the Beneficiary were published in outlets not established as major media or professional trade publications; one lacked a required author credit. Self-promotional publisher materials were insufficient to establish major media status.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Most articles were about the Beneficiary's employers rather than about the Beneficiary himself. Articles that were about the Beneficiary were published in outlets not established as major media or professional trade publications; one lacked a required author credit. Self-promotional publisher materials were insufficient to establish major media status.
None of the asserted memberships demonstrated that outstanding achievements in software engineering were required. Founders Network and IVY had criteria unrelated to outstanding field achievements; Hive Global and HPAIR offered training programs or conferences rather than organizational membership.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
None of the asserted memberships demonstrated that outstanding achievements in software engineering were required. Founders Network and IVY had criteria unrelated to outstanding field achievements; Hive Global and HPAIR offered training programs or conferences rather than organizational membership.
The provisional patent was not demonstrated to be of major significance in the field; letters from employers described contributions to specific companies rather than the field broadly; publications on websites like medium.com lacked evidence of major significance; and no evidence showed wide implementation or remarkable field-wide impact.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The provisional patent was not demonstrated to be of major significance in the field; letters from employers described contributions to specific companies rather than the field broadly; publications on websites like medium.com lacked evidence of major significance; and no evidence showed wide implementation or remarkable field-wide impact.
None of the hackathon placements, competition wins, scholarships, or other recognitions were sufficiently documented as nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence in software engineering. Many lacked corroborating documentation, pertained to fields other than software engineering, or reflected placement in qualifying rounds rather than award receipt.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
None of the hackathon placements, competition wins, scholarships, or other recognitions were sufficiently documented as nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence in software engineering. Many lacked corroborating documentation, pertained to fields other than software engineering, or reflected placement in qualifying rounds rather than award receipt.