Part-time employment can count toward labor certification experience requirements; the Beneficiary's 28 months of half-time employment equates to 14 months of full-time employment, so combined with her full-time employment the total exceeds 36 months.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Part-time employment can count toward labor certification experience requirements; the Beneficiary's 28 months of half-time employment equates to 14 months of full-time employment, so combined with her full-time employment the total exceeds 36 months.
AAO acknowledged substantial merit in the Petitioner's preservation and remodeling consulting work but found the record failed to show that the prospective impact of her specific proposed endeavor—serving two clients—rises to national importance. Her work does not demonstrate broader field-level impact, significant U.S. job creation potential, or substantial positive economic effects at a national level.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO acknowledged substantial merit in the Petitioner's preservation and remodeling consulting work but found the record failed to show that the prospective impact of her specific proposed endeavor—serving two clients—rises to national importance. Her work does not demonstrate broader field-level impact, significant U.S. job creation potential, or substantial positive economic effects at a national level.
AAO explicitly declined to analyze the second prong because the Petitioner failed to establish the first prong, rendering further analysis unnecessary.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly declined to analyze the second prong because the Petitioner failed to establish the first prong, rendering further analysis unnecessary.
published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media
AAO 为什么未被说服
The AAO agreed with the Director that the criterion was not met. Most articles mentioned the Petitioner only briefly or not at all; the one substantial article failed to establish the publication qualified as major media.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO agreed with the Director that the criterion was not met. Most articles mentioned the Petitioner only briefly or not at all; the one substantial article failed to establish the publication qualified as major media.
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
AAO 为什么未被说服
The AAO withdrew the Director's favorable finding on two grounds: the record did not establish that the prizes from the tournament were nationally or internationally recognized, and the Petitioner did not submit documentary evidence that he actually received the claimed prizes. The AAO also found the submitted certificates were not nationally or internationally recognized prizes for excellence in the field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO withdrew the Director's favorable finding on two grounds: the record did not establish that the prizes from the tournament were nationally or internationally recognized, and the Petitioner did not submit documentary evidence that he actually received the claimed prizes. The AAO also found the submitted certificates were not nationally or internationally recognized prizes for excellence in the field.
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations or establishments
裁决如何说明
The AAO reserved this criterion for the same reason as criterion (iv): even if met, it could not combine with other established criteria to reach the required threshold of three.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO reserved this criterion for the same reason as criterion (iv): even if met, it could not combine with other established criteria to reach the required threshold of three.
The AAO reserved this criterion because, even if met, it could not combine with any other established criterion to reach the required threshold of three, making detailed discussion unnecessary.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO reserved this criterion because, even if met, it could not combine with any other established criterion to reach the required threshold of three, making detailed discussion unnecessary.
None of the three articles about the Petitioner were shown to appear in professional or major trade publications or other major media. Sprudge.com rankings were unexplained and lacked comparative circulation data; the NBC affiliate website evidence did not show high online circulation; ireport.cnn.com articles were not verified by CNN and lacked circulation statistics.…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
None of the three articles about the Petitioner were shown to appear in professional or major trade publications or other major media. Sprudge.com rankings were unexplained and lacked comparative circulation data; the NBC affiliate website evidence did not show high online circulation; ireport.cnn.com articles were not verified by CNN and lacked circulation statistics. The remaining two articles were not about the Petitioner at all. Even if they were, neither thecurbkaimuki.com nor baristamagazine.com was shown to be major media.