可追溯来源的裁决研究
从大量个案裁决理由中检索，再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。
本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录，而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误；标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率，也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。
10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定
当前显示 13671–13680
案件事实
审查的问题
participation as a judge of the work of others
证据为何得到认可
AAO agreed with the Director that criterion (iv) is met.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
AAO agreed with the Director that criterion (iv) is met.
案件事实
审查的问题
performance in a leading or critical role for organizations with a distinguished reputation
证据为何得到认可
AAO agreed with the Director that criterion (viii) is met.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
AAO agreed with the Director that criterion (viii) is met.
案件事实
审查的问题
display at artistic exhibitions or showcases
证据为何得到认可
AAO agreed with the Director that criterion (vii) is met.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
AAO agreed with the Director that criterion (vii) is met.
案件事实
审查的问题
original contributions of major significance
裁决如何说明
The Petitioner did not dispute the Director's finding regarding criterion (v) on appeal.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
The Petitioner did not dispute the Director's finding regarding criterion (v) on appeal.
案件事实
审查的问题
original contributions of major significance
裁决如何说明
AAO found the Director failed to address this criterion at all and remanded for analysis of the original contributions evidence.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
AAO found the Director failed to address this criterion at all and remanded for analysis of the original contributions evidence.
案件事实
审查的问题
high salary or remuneration
裁决如何说明
AAO found the Director improperly applied a more restrictive standard requiring earnings specifically from employment as a 'construction CMS consultant,' whereas the regulation only requires high salary relative to others 'in the field,' which the Petitioner defined as business development in the construction industry.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
AAO found the Director improperly applied a more restrictive standard requiring earnings specifically from employment as a 'construction CMS consultant,' whereas the regulation only requires high salary relative to others 'in the field,' which the Petitioner defined as business development in the construction industry.
案件事实
审查的问题
judging the work of others
裁决如何说明
AAO found the Director failed to address this criterion at all and remanded for analysis of the judging evidence.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
AAO found the Director failed to address this criterion at all and remanded for analysis of the judging evidence.
案件事实
审查的问题
prizes or awards
裁决如何说明
AAO remanded without reaching the merits of this criterion, directing the Director to re-examine the evidence with proper analysis and without imposing novel requirements.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
AAO remanded without reaching the merits of this criterion, directing the Director to re-examine the evidence with proper analysis and without imposing novel requirements.
案件事实
审查的问题
published material about the petitioner
裁决如何说明
AAO remanded for re-examination of this criterion with proper analysis and without novel requirements.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
AAO remanded for re-examination of this criterion with proper analysis and without novel requirements.
案件事实
审查的问题
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievement
裁决如何说明
AAO found the Director failed to address this criterion at all and remanded for the Director to analyze the evidence submitted under the membership criterion.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
AAO found the Director failed to address this criterion at all and remanded for the Director to analyze the evidence submitted under the membership criterion.